Questions tagged [false-sharing]

False sharing is the condition, where in parallel programs, memory cache lines are shared by two or more threads and writes on one cache line would force other cores working on the same line to re-validate their cache. This is a concurrency anti-pattern.

Questions with this tag should be about a suspected or actual false sharing problem.

False sharing is the condition in which in parallel programs, in which memory cache lines which are shared by two or more threads. Writes on one cache line would force other cores working in the same line to re-validate their cache. This is a concurrency anti-pattern.

enter image description here

Note that in the diagram above, Thread 1 writes to A and never B, yet Thread 2 must re-validate its cache to continue computation.

Common ways to alleviate false sharing include storing a thread local result to update to a shared spaced once the computation is completed, and/or spacing contiguous memory blocks that are shared, so they are not on the same cache line.

More information:

Wikipedia

C++ Today Blog Article

93 questions
2
votes
1 answer

Prevent false sharing using padding

I want to compute the sum of a big matrix and I'm currently seeing no performance improvements when I use multiple threads or just a single one. I think the problem is relating to false sharing but I also added a padding to my struct. Please have a…
fatffatable
  • 399
  • 3
  • 11
2
votes
1 answer

Java padding performance busting

Hi Guys so i got this piece of code public class Padding { static class Pair { volatile long c1; // UN-comment this line and see how perofmance is boosted * 2 // long q1; //Magic dodo thingy volatile long c2; …
urag
  • 1,228
  • 9
  • 28
2
votes
1 answer

performance counter events associated with false sharing

I am looking at the performance of OpenMP program, specifically cache and memory performance. I have found guidelines while back ago how to analyze performance with Vtune that mentioned which counters to watch out for. However now cannot seem to…
Anycorn
  • 50,217
  • 42
  • 167
  • 261
2
votes
2 answers

False Sharing only became noticeable on certain machines

I wrote the following test class in java to reproduce the performance penalty introduced by "False Sharing". Basically you can tweak the "size" of array from 4 to a much larger value (e.g. 10000) to turn the "False Sharing phenomenon" either on or…
njzhxf
  • 837
  • 1
  • 7
  • 9
1
vote
2 answers

OpenMP False Sharing

I believe I am experiencing false sharing using OpenMP. Is there any way to identify it and fix it? My code is: https://github.com/wchan/libNN/blob/master/ResilientBackpropagation.hpp line 36. Using a 4 core CPU compared to the single threaded 1…
1
vote
1 answer

Workaround for writing in different entries of the same vector in multithreading

I already described a similar problem, but only to undrstand its causes. If this counts as duplicated as well, I will remove the quetion I work on a problem which can be thought of a sort of shortest path computation in really big graph. On this…
1
vote
1 answer

How can one analyze cacheline contention for multithreaded programs on Linux/AMD? Like "perf c2c" can for Intel

With Intel chips, it is possible to analyze cacheline contention using the "perf c2c" command? Is there anything similar that can be used with AMD processors? Specifically, for the case where a core attempts to read a cacheline that is currently in…
Dan Kennedy
  • 468
  • 1
  • 5
  • 9
1
vote
2 answers

Array Padding does not mitigate false sharing? C, OpenMP

#include #include static long num_steps = 100000000; double step; #define PAD 8 #define NUM_THREADS 6 void main(){ int i, nthreads; double pi=0, sum[NUM_THREADS][PAD]={0}; step = 1.0/(double)…
1
vote
0 answers

Speedup when avoiding false sharing problem?

I am trying to add cache-line padding to avoid false sharing problem but I cant see a big difference in speedup. With padding its only 1.2 x faster. I am running the code without padding and the one with padding n = 700 milion times for testing.…
Leon
  • 63
  • 7
1
vote
1 answer

OpenMP poor performance with arrays

I have the following issue: I am trying to parallelize a very simple PDE solver in c++ with openMP but the performance does not improve if I increase the number of threads. The equation is a simple 1D heat equation with convection. Since I need the…
user7383101
1
vote
1 answer

False sharing in OpenMP when writing to a single vector

I learnt OpenMP using Tim Matterson's lecture notes, and he gave an example of false sharing as below. The code is simple and is used to calculate pi from numerical integral of 4.0/(1+x*x) with x ranges from 0 to 1. The code uses a vector to contain…
DiveIntoML
  • 2,347
  • 2
  • 20
  • 36
1
vote
0 answers

Why 7 padding fields in Disruptor, but 6 fields in Mechanical Sympathy - False sharing

In LMAX-Exchange/Disruptor 3.4.3, RingBuffer put 7 long padding fields (via extends RingBufferPad) before its really fields abstract class RingBufferPad { protected long p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7; } and put another 7 long padding fields at the…
Jacky1205
  • 3,273
  • 3
  • 22
  • 44
1
vote
1 answer

avoiding false sharing to improve performance

#include #include #include using namespace std; using namespace std::chrono; int a = 0; int padding[16]; // avoid false sharing int b = 0; promise p; shared_future sf = p.get_future().share(); void…
olist
  • 877
  • 5
  • 13
1
vote
2 answers

Would this std::vector push_back in OpenMP parallel region result in false-sharing?

The sample code below is a simplified version of my working code. In this code, writing to shared variable is done only at the last line where std::vector::push_back is called. std::vector results; #pragma omp parallel for…
nglee
  • 1,913
  • 9
  • 32
1
vote
0 answers

Avoiding false sharing when in OpenMP parallel loop

Consider a parallel loop, where each thread will be computing on a private vector dudz(izfirst:izlast). In my implementation, I want to accomplish two things: Not allocate memory when this parallel region is entered (it is called every time…
NoseKnowsAll
  • 4,593
  • 2
  • 23
  • 44