In QML, how can I prevent a child element from inheriting the opacity from its parent? I want to set different opacity values for the parent and it's child element.
9 Answers
I think, one way would be to use semi transparent colors as described here instead of opacity.
e.g. using quad color code like #800000FF
for semi transparent blue.

- 16,753
- 12
- 73
- 90

- 161
- 1
- 3
-
If you can assign a single color directly (not a composite item and not an image), this solution is perfect. – jdo Jul 09 '13 at 13:45
-
Thank you, this solved my issue. I actually just set #00000000, and it worked perfectly. – While-E Aug 10 '18 at 14:28
-
1To emphasize, the transparency digits are the **first two** digits. Different alpha values can be found in this chart: https://gist.github.com/lopspower/03fb1cc0ac9f32ef38f4 – pooya13 Apr 20 '21 at 22:55
Actually, setting layer.enabled: true
for the parent element does the thing for me.
The whole element is rendered to the buffer, and opacity
is applied to the resulting buffer (to the whole layer at once).
See http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qml-qtquick-item.html#layer.enabled-prop
Example code:
Rectangle {
width: 400
height: 200
opacity: 0.5
layer.enabled: true
Rectangle {
width: parent.width
height: parent.height
color: 'red'
}
Rectangle {
width: parent.width / 2
height: parent.height
color: 'blue'
}
}
That is a solution, but make sure that you know what you are doing when enabling layering.
Another possible solution would be using a shadereffect.
Thanks to peppe on #qt@freenode.

- 151
- 2
- 5
-
-
[Layer Opacity vs Item Opacity](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qml-qtquick-item.html#layer-opacity-vs-item-opacity). So `layers.enabled` controls item by item alpha blending – Mohammad Kanan Mar 02 '21 at 00:19
You can't. Items opacity value is relative to their parents one, so if you code something like
Rectangle {
color: "red"
opacity: 0.5
width: 200; height: 100
Rectangle {
color: "blue"
opacity: 1
width: 100; height: 100
}
}
You will see that the two rectangles have the same opacity.

- 1,039
- 17
- 29
-
I can confirm this behavior even now. Frankly, I can't see a reason for such a choice, I suspect it's a bug. – Avio Jun 06 '13 at 09:16
-
2I don't think it's a bug. It's the same form many common properties (e.g.: x, y, z). It allows you not to arrange every Item using absolute references. – TheHuge_ Jun 10 '13 at 07:37
-
I tried to open a bug against QtQml, it has been closed in minutes, so it seems that Qt folks are of your same opinion. But I'm still skeptik about this matter. If I write a line of code, I don't want it to be ignored in first place, secondly if it has to be ignored, I'd like to be warned that my code has not effect. But, again, I can't see a reason why, if a block of elements have opacity 0.5, I can't make just one of it having opacity 1. And if they are logically grouped as children of the main container, why should I make just one of it a sibling? – Avio Jun 10 '13 at 07:58
-
1If you set the opacity of a group of Items to 0.5, it means to me (and to Qt guys) that you want to set that value to all the Items in the group. Otherwise you should set this value just to the Items you want to. – TheHuge_ Jun 10 '13 at 09:04
-
What I mean is to have the possibility to _add an exception_ to the opacity policy of the group. If you have tens of elements inside a logical group, and you want just only one of it to behave differently from the others, why should you pick it up and place it apart from the others? I mean, the logical hierarchy of the elements exists regardless of the opacity of its members. – Avio Jun 10 '13 at 11:02
-
You can add a custom `defaultOpacity` property to the root, and point the opacity of each child to that or set a specific value in the "exceptional" ones. Of course I'm not sayng this is THE right way of treating the opacity inheritance; it just makes sense to me. – TheHuge_ Jun 10 '13 at 12:10
-
1yeah... that's how opacity typically works in a scene graph: a node's opacity is the node's local opacity multiplied by it's ancestors, opacity. For this reason, if the parent has a local opacity of 0.5 and the child has a local opacity of 1.0, the resulting opacity for the child will be parent's opacity (0.5) x child local opacity (1.0) = 0.5. However, I would expect that putting the opacity value to 2.0 would work, because 0.5 * 2.0 = 1.0. I tried it and it didn't work unfortunately. It looks like Qt is clamping the opacity values between 0 .. 1 too soon... :( – mchiasson Oct 21 '15 at 13:31
I've bumped into this issue just now. Using Qt 5.1.0
In my case, I had a Rectangle
Element with opacity: 0.6
and a child Image
element. The Image
was inheriting the transparency - not desired.
To solve it, I enclosed the main Rectangle
in an Item
element. Passed the size/position definitions from the Rectangle
to the outer Item
. Moved the Image
outside the Rectangle
.
In the end, I had Item
as the main parent and Rectangle
and Image
side by side, inside Item
.
Only Rectangle
maintained the opacity 0.6, so the Rectangle has transparency and Image
is fully opaque.

- 7,502
- 6
- 51
- 82

- 81
- 1
- 2
It's possible! You need to test in the Component.onCompleted
scope the opacity of the parent. If its 0 you need to change the parent of your object to the parent of it's current parent.
Example:
Item{
id:root
Item{
id:currentParent
opacity: 0
Item{
id:item
Component.onCompleted:{
if(parent.opacity === 0)
item.parent = currentParent.parent
}
}
}
}

- 1,092
- 1
- 9
- 14
You cannot prevent the child element from inheriting the opacity from its parent.
My personal work around is to change this:
Rectangle {
color: "red"
opacity: 0.5
width: 200; height: 100
Rectangle {
color: "blue"
opacity: 1
width: 100; height: 100
}
}
Into this:
Item {
width: 200; height: 100
Rectangle {
anchors.fill: parent
color: "red"
opacity: 0.5
}
Rectangle {
color: "blue"
opacity: 1
width: 100; height: 100
}
}
or this (only possible if the parent is a solid color):
Rectangle {
color: "#7FFF0000" // 50% transparent red
opacity: 0.5
width: 200; height: 100
Rectangle {
color: "blue"
opacity: 1
width: 100; height: 100
}
}

- 2,452
- 25
- 27
it is not possible to do that but you can change their color with
Qt.lighter(color,opacity)
for example
Rectangle {
color: Qt.lighter("red",.5)
width: 200; height: 100
Rectangle {
color: Qt.lighter("blue",1)
width: 100; height: 100
}
}

- 3,309
- 5
- 31
- 45
I don't think its possible. you have to make two element sibling and changes its opacity as you wish.

- 3,475
- 21
- 14
I also ran into this problem with Qt 4.8.6.
In my particular case, I wanted the top level item to be 20% transparent with black color, but have its child elements be unaffected by any opacity/transparency setting from the parent.
Opacity did not work, due to the inheritance mechanism of QML.
But I was able to use the rgba function from the Qml Qt object. This allowed me to get exactly what I wanted, the parent is now 20% transparent, but the child elements are unaffected.
Rectangle {
width: 400
height: 400
color: Qt.rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2) // Works perfectly, pure black with 20% transparency, equal to 0.2 opacity
// Unaffacted child elements here...
}
Note: I also tried to use the RGBA color codes directly, as mentioned by a previous poster, but it did not work.
Example:
color: "#000000FA" // Supposed to be semi transparent, but always transparent, regardless of the alpha value
Setting the alpha value for any other RGBA values worked, just not with pure black.

- 846
- 1
- 15
- 25
-
1the color property in QML is ARGB, not RGBA. Change your color to `#FA000000` and it will work. – mchiasson Oct 23 '15 at 12:16
-
You are correct. Perhaps, because I was working with Qt.rgba(..) previously, I got it stuck in my mind at the time that the color type was using the same format. – ManuelH Oct 23 '15 at 13:18