32

Many people are currently arguing that African Americans are being killed by police disproportionately to their percentage of the US population.

An example of the claim is given at Mapping Police Violence:

Unarmed black people were killed at 5x the rate of unarmed whites in 2015

Is it true that police are more likely to kill African Americans than other races?

Laurel
  • 30,040
  • 9
  • 132
  • 118
dsollen
  • 10,062
  • 12
  • 43
  • 71
  • 2
    There is a claim which has been repeated in major news channels that this is true so it should be possible to find it. Moreover, there is a dataset that could address it compiled by [The Washington Post](https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-shootings/). – matt_black Jul 10 '16 at 21:19
  • I manage to find one recent paper on it http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-9133.12187/abstract It has numerous methodological problems (video simulation in a lab, and the results are likely due to recent media attention to shootings and ethnicity making police less eager to shoot blacks in 2016) but they also showed that 96% of officers had racial bias with 78% having moderate/strong racial bias (Harvard implicit), but no anti-white bias. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/true-crime/wp/2016/04/27/this-study-found-race-matters-in-police-shootings-but-the-results-may-surprise-you/ – EmilKarlsson Jul 10 '16 at 23:07
  • "Is it true that police are more likely to kill African Americans than other races?" or "Are African Americans victims of a disproportionate number of police killings?" are not equivalent to "Are UNARMED black people killed in disproportionate numbers," to use the quoted claim. Also the issue that is often raised is not about raw numbers, but about the perceived lack of sanction or consequence for taking an African-American life. Hence the "Black Lives Matter" moniker. – PoloHoleSet Sep 22 '16 at 14:04

1 Answers1

38

It depends on the measure

Mapping Police Violence (MPV) says:

Unarmed black people were killed at 5x the rate of unarmed whites in 2015

This is a real statistic, but it is important to understand what it says. For every million white people and every million black people, a certain number of unarmed people of that race are killed by police. That number for black people is about five times as high as the equivalent number for white people. All that said, even just looking at unarmed people, their data shows more whites (259) than blacks (244) were killed.

That source did their own research, but it is consistent with other sources. For example, the Washington Post found:

In a Post analysis looking at population-adjusted rates, unarmed black men were seven times as likely as unarmed whites to die from police gunfire.

That said, there are some weaknesses in the MPV analysis if someone wants to claim it proves racism.

While looking through the data, I found one case where a former police officer is accused of murdering his ex-girlfriend. While she was black and unarmed, it seems something of a stretch to call this a police killing. He certainly wasn't on-duty or acting in any kind of official capacity at the time. A double murder and suicide, a backyard brawl, and other off-duty examples also pollute the data.

In one case, the decedent had been drowning a police officer when killed. While technically unarmed, his use of water as a weapon would likely have resulted in the officer's death if he had not been stopped.

The data doesn't say whether the killer was white or black. We usually discuss these statistics when there is a case involving a white police office and a black decedent. The statistics don't tell us how common or rare that is.

The MPV source includes:

  • an innocent bystander or hostage killed
  • a pedestrian or motorist accidentally hit by a police car or passengers in a vehicle chased by police with no weapon on them
  • drivers or passengers accidentally hit by a police car

To claim racism here, you have to argue not that police are deliberately targeting black people to be killed but that they are more negligent when potential victims are black than white. That's certainly possible, but it is rarely what people are discussing.

Are there other explanations? Certainly. By the same kind of metric, crime is more likely to occur in black neighborhoods than white neighborhoods. As such, situations where an innocent bystander is killed are more likely to happen in black neighborhoods (where the criminals are).

Some measures that support explanations other than racism:

More white people than black people are killed by police. In the Washington Post data this was 494 to 258 (a ratio of just over 1.9:1).

From the Department of Justice as published by National Review:

DOJ statistics on crime by race of victim and alleged offender

  • 22.4% of violent crimes are committed by blacks.
  • 42.9% of violent crimes are committed by whites.

Going back to the Washington Post data:

  • 26% (258 of 990) police killings involved black decedents.
  • 50% (494 of 990) police killings involved white decedents.

Commentary notes that this gives a similar rate for blacks and whites when compared with their relative crime rates.

Of course, not all decedents in police killings are involved in violent crimes. The real use of that number is as a proxy for police contacts by race, which is not generally tracked.

An alternate source of data where analysis showed similar conclusions. That only studied urban areas where more people are black. And it only looked at homicides.

Black neighborhoods are poorer, may spend less money on police training and salaries, and may use police in roles where wealthier neighborhoods would call in specialists.

ProPublica has data on the race of the police officers. 78% of those killed by black officers are black. Contrast that with 46% of those killed by white officers.

Summary

More whites than blacks are killed by police, but there are more whites than blacks overall. Taken by population, blacks are more likely to be killed by police than whites, but blacks are more likely to be involved in crimes. Normalizing by ratio of police killings to ratio of violent crimes by race, blacks and whites are about equally likely to be the decedent in a police killing.

Brythan
  • 10,162
  • 5
  • 46
  • 53
  • 4
    The stat also means very little if it is not compared to those who have an altercation with police and are not shot and killed. How many whites are *not* killed in police altercations vs blacks killed? –  Jul 12 '16 at 03:21
  • 3
    "**but blacks are more likely to be involved in crimes**" Do you have any evidence to back this up? Or do you think black people are more prone to crimes? @Brythan – samayo Jul 26 '16 at 14:41
  • 11
    @samayo The FBI data bears that out. There are some issues with that data, one being white hispanics versus non-white hispanics. But that doesn't change the overall statistics on black crime, its more likely. That data also isn't very fine. – EricLeaf Apr 24 '17 at 13:16
  • 11
    Are we sure that data is not just saying that African Americans are involved in more _detected_ crime? Is it controlled for rate of policing in predominantly African American neighborhoods vs. other neighborhoods in some way? – Jeff Lambert Jun 05 '20 at 18:04
  • 1
    @JeffLambert Relevant question, typically ignored. Hard evidence might be difficult to gather. _If_ homicides are the most robustly detected/recorded category of crimes, that would indeed support the idea of crimes to be [overproportional among African Americans](https://tinyurl.com/ycsqjadk). A detection/recording bias could btw also go the other way round: given/if black communities are more violent/poorer, one could easily imagine smaller crimes being seen as lower priority. That said, differences in the data seem very large, I personally would find it rather unlikely to be mere artefact. – FlorianH Jun 07 '20 at 20:32
  • 2
    I am surprised, I thought whites are killed way more by police because police is incentivized to be extra careful with black suspects. If you take out latino out of white it would probably change the data quite a bit. – user1721135 Jun 16 '20 at 07:54
  • 4
    @user1721135 — I would think very few killings, justified or un, take place in a situation where anyone is worried about the paperwork ramifications if things turn deadly. – Michael Lorton Jan 28 '21 at 04:46
  • 1
    Another thing not mentioned when giving the raw "more blacks are killed than whites by police. RACISM!" is that a lot of those blacks are killed by black police officers, in fact I believe that a disproportionate number of all people killed by police are killed by black officers (for whatever reason, most likely because they are more likely to be stationed in high crime areas). It's quite a stretch to claim that a black cop killing a black guy (accidentally or not) is a white supremacist (though I'm sure someone will try). – jwenting Nov 15 '21 at 12:47
  • 1
    @EricLeaf, it's worth pointing out that the FBI data bear out what more black people are charged/convicted of crimes than white people. That doesn't mean more are involved in them. I'm only aware of anecdotal data (I think it'd be hard to get good statistical data), but there's a "begging the question" issue involved here: if police are more likely to target black people, they're more likely to charge/convict them of crimes. – Ben Hocking Nov 16 '21 at 14:03
  • Anyone who thinks there's one and only one simple explanation for any of this is a buffoon. – barbecue Nov 16 '21 at 22:59