10

If I connect to an oracle database as user smith, and issue the following 3 commands:

update smith.tablea
set col_name = 'florence' where col_id = 8;

insert into bob.other_table@mylink
values ('blah',2,'uncle','new');

commit;

Does this mean that the update to the local table (smith.tablea) and the insert to the remote db table (bob.other_table) have both been committed or that just the update to the local table has been committed?

Note: that 'mylink' represents a dblink to a remote database.

toop
  • 10,834
  • 24
  • 66
  • 87
  • Have you checked `bob.other_table@mylink` in another session to check whether the data is there or has it not worked? – Ben Mar 06 '12 at 10:55

2 Answers2

9

From documentation

The Oracle two-phase commit mechanism is completely transparent to users who issue distributed transactions. In fact, users need not even know the transaction is distributed. A COMMIT statement denoting the end of a transaction automatically triggers the two-phase commit mechanism to commit the transaction. No coding or complex statement syntax is required to include distributed transactions within the body of a database application.

so - yes, if everything goes fine, both operations are commited.

Marcin Wroblewski
  • 3,491
  • 18
  • 27
6

In this case the transaction should only work if the remote transaction and your local transaction are successfull.

More information about distributed transactions:

http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14231/ds_txnman.htm

Eggi
  • 1,684
  • 4
  • 20
  • 31