I'm trying to build a custom AlertDialog
by extending the AlertDialog
class.
As usual, I'm setting up the dialog inside its onCreate()
method. Or, I'm trying to do so:
@Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
this.setTitle("Some title");
this.setButton(BUTTON_POSITIVE, "Click me", (DialogInterface.OnClickListener)null);
final FrameLayout custom = (FrameLayout) this
.findViewById(android.R.id.custom);
custom.addView(this.getLayoutInflater().inflate(R.layout.mydlg, null),
LayoutParams.MATCH_PARENT, LayoutParams.WRAP_CONTENT);
}
Now, when it comes to displaying an instance of this dialog, nothing is shown. The current Activity
fades out and loses focus but not a single pixel of my dialog is displayed. Pressing Back brings the Activity
back to the foreground, indicating to me that a dialog actually is shown, but just a completely empty one.
However, when I create an AlertDialog
and use, for instance, dlg.setButton(BUTTON_POSITIVE, "Click me", (DialogInterface.OnClickListener)null);
the dialog is shown with the respective button.
Even when I set up my custom dialog in its constructor using the very same code as above everything seems to work ok.
Now, how can this be? Why can't I seem to initialize my dialog in its onCreate()
method? Isn't this the way you're supposed to initialize any GUI element? What am I missing?
EDIT
Please note, that something is 'shown', fading out the Activity and taking focus from it. It's just that it seems to be completely empty/invisible.
Here another attempt:
this.setTitle("Some title");
this.setButton(BUTTON_POSITIVE, "Click me", (DialogInterface.OnClickListener)null);
final View v = this.getLayoutInflater().inflate(R.layout.mydlg, null);
this.setView(v);
These exact lines do work when put into my dialog's constructor.
These exact lines do not work when put into my dialog's onCreate()
.
What is going on here?!
Generally, am I not supposed to do it in onCreate()
? - Am I facing trouble if I resort to doing the above initialization in the constructor instead? (This does not seem too clean to me, anyway.)