-2

I used AI to convert a math formula into an example code to test how facial features could be converted to genetic traits and output as a family tree of genes. It output the following that can run correctly due to errors: "`

import numpy as np
from scipy.spatial import cKDTree
from scipy.interpolate import griddata
from scipy.optimize import minimize
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

# 1. Represent phenotype as function u(x,y)
# Use (x,y) coordinates of 3D face scan
x = [1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8] 
y = [3, 1, 7, 6, 9, 4]
u = [0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.4, 0.2, 0.7] 

# 2. Detect key points by finding local minima/maxima
tree = cKDTree(np.c_[x, y])
query_point = np.array([[0, 10], [5, 5]])  # Query points as a 2D array
keypts_indices = tree.query(query_point, k=3)[1]

print("Indices of Key Points:", keypts_indices)

# 3. Encode genotype as vector
v1, v2 = 0.7, 1.5 

# 4. Relate genotype and phenotype through PDE
def laplacian(u):
    du_dx = np.gradient(u, axis=0)
    du_dy = np.gradient(u, axis=1)
    d2u_dx2 = np.gradient(du_dx, axis=0)[0]
    d2u_dy2 = np.gradient(du_dy, axis=1)[0]
    return d2u_dx2 + d2u_dy2

def phenotype(v1, v2, x, y, u):
    u_2d = u.reshape(grid_x.shape)  # Reshape u to match the grid dimensions
    return (v1 * np.array(x) + v2 * np.array(y)) * laplacian(u_2d)

# 5. Solve PDE to predict u(x,y) from genotype  
grid_x, grid_y = np.mgrid[0:10:100j, 0:10:100j]
u_pred = griddata((x, y), u, (grid_x, grid_y), method='cubic')

# 6. Optimize v1, v2 to fit observed u(x,y) 
def loss_function(params):
    v1, v2 = params
    predicted_u = phenotype(v1, v2, x, y, u_pred)
    loss = np.sum((u - predicted_u)**2)
    return loss

initial_guess = [0.5, 1.0]  # Initial guess for v1 and v2
optimized_params = minimize(loss_function, initial_guess, method='L-BFGS-B').x
optimal_v1, optimal_v2 = optimized_params

print("Optimized v1:", optimal_v1)
print("Optimized v2:", optimal_v2)

# 7. Validate model, visualize results
u_optimal = phenotype(optimal_v1, optimal_v2, grid_x, grid_y, u_pred)

plt.figure(figsize=(12, 5))

# Original phenotype
plt.subplot(1, 2, 1)
plt.scatter(x, y, c=u, marker='o', cmap='viridis')
plt.colorbar(label='Phenotype u')
plt.title('Observed Phenotype')

# Predicted phenotype after optimization
plt.subplot(1, 2, 2)
plt.imshow(u_optimal.T, extent=(0, 10, 0, 10), origin='lower', cmap='viridis',
           vmin=min(u), vmax=max(u), aspect='auto', interpolation='nearest')
plt.colorbar(label='Phenotype u')
plt.title('Predicted Phenotype after Optimization')

plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()`

The errors were as follows: "--->

47 optimized_params = minimize(loss_function, initial_guess, method='L-BFGS-B').x
48 optimal_v1, optimal_v2 = optimized_params
49

in phenotype(v1, v2, x, y, u)
31 def phenotype(v1, v2, x, y, u):
32     u_2d = u.reshape(grid_x.shape)  # Reshape u to match the grid dimensions
\---\> 33     return (v1 \* np.array(x) + v2 \* np.array(y)) \* laplacian(u_2d)
34
35 # 5. Solve PDE to predict u(x,y) from genotype

ValueError: operands could not be broadcast together with shapes (6,) (100,)

I asked many different AI code model to suggest corrects but none of them fixed anything.

quamrana
  • 37,849
  • 12
  • 53
  • 71
  • 1
    Do you mean this code was generated by ChatGPT? StackOverflow has a policy of not debugging the nonsense code that often comes out of ChatGPT. – Tim Roberts Aug 27 '23 at 18:09
  • Really, I will admit that ChatGPT and other AIs have big problems with code but I use mathematics as the base for anything that is being done so in the end the code is functional in colab when testing. However, fixing the bugs has become more of a problem since the so called updates of the AI models. Yet the math is still sound. – Mag Nota 360V Edition Aug 27 '23 at 18:36

0 Answers0