Is it a way to use function from static lib, if I don't have header file, only *.a file, but I know function signature?
2 Answers
Yes, if you know the function signature
Just write the function signature before calling it, as:
void f(int); //it is as if you've included a header file
//then call it
f(100);
All you need to do is : link the slib.a
to the program.
Also, remember that, if the static library is written in C and has been compiled with C compiler, then you've to use extern "C"
when writing the function signature (if you program in C++), as:
extern "C" void f(int); //it is as if you've included a header file
//then call it
f(100);
Alternatively, if you've many functions, then you can group them together as:
extern "C"
{
void f(int);
void g(int, int);
void h(int, const char*);
}
You may prefer writing all the function signatures in a namespace so as to avoid any possible name-collisions:
namespace capi
{
extern "C"
{
void f(int);
void g(int, int);
void h(int, const char*);
}
}
//use them as:
capi::f(100);
capi::g(100,200);
capi::h(100,200, "string");
Now you can write all these in a header file so that you could include the header file in your .cpp
files (as usual), and call the function(s) (as usual).
Hope that helps.

- 353,942
- 115
- 666
- 851
-
15In other words: Write the header file for the library yourself. – sth Oct 06 '11 at 10:25
-
How about calling classes and their member functions? I am facing similar situation but the functions I need are defined as members of a specific class defined in a .lib file. And I do know all the signatures. – DCoder Mar 04 '23 at 12:40
-
1@DCoder: The members are non-static functions? If so, then it might have data members as well, with a layout which not known to your compilers. In short, your scenario is difficult, and you have to look for, or ask the developers of the lib to expose the class. – Nawaz Mar 04 '23 at 17:30
The easiest way: Write the signature in a header file, include it and link against the library.

- 35,651
- 4
- 70
- 100