I have an application installed locally (not developed by me), which broadcasts UDP packets every second. Reading the packets from my application (developed in C++ in Windows) which also is locally installed, works fine.
WSADATA data;
WORD version = MAKEWORD(2, 2);
int wsOK = WSAStartup(version, &data);
SOCKET serverIn = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_UDP);
sockaddr_in serverHint;
serverHint.sin_addr.S_un.S_addr = INADDR_ANY;
serverHint.sin_family = AF_INET;
serverHint.sin_port = htons(UDP_RECEIVE_PORT);
bind(serverIn, (sockaddr*)&serverHint, sizeof(serverHint));
sockaddr_in client;
int clientSize = sizeof(client);
int RECIEVE_BUFFER_SIZE = 65507;
char* recieveBuffer = new char[RECIEVE_BUFFER_SIZE];
while(updating)
{
int bytesIn = recvfrom(serverIn, recieveBuffer, RECIEVE_BUFFER_SIZE, 0, (sockaddr*)&client, &clientSize);
}
closesocket(serverIn);
WSACleanup();
But I recently noticed while I was testing some code, while my app was running, that the bind(...) function returned an error code of 10048 (WSAEADDRINUSE). Hence, it seems the first client bound to listen for the UDP packets is the only one who can listen, and the other clients is unable to read the broadcasted UDP packets.
So then I added the SO_REUSEADDR option before calling the bind(...) function to be able to bind successfully to the socket:
BOOL bOptVal = TRUE;
int bOptLen = sizeof(BOOL);
setsockopt((SOCKET)serverIn, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, (char*)&bOptVal, bOptLen);
That works, but the recvfrom(...) function then does not recieve any data at all! I guess it waits for the other client to close its socket.
Next solution is to initialize the socket with SOCK_RAW instead. The above option SO_REUSEADDR is now not needed, and remove it:
SOCKET serverIn = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_UDP);
This works, I can read the data now! Though, Windows now requires the adminstrator rights for my application. Also I do recieve the UDP information in the data which I do not need.
Is there any better method to do this without requiring administrator rights, any possibility to discard the header information in the buffer?