In AHK return
is what you'd learn return
to be from other programming languages. It's just that control flow, and in general the legacy syntax, in AHK is different from what you might be used to from other languages.
How is return
different from exit
?
If we're not trying to return a value from a function, and are just interested in the control flow, there is not much difference. But the difference is there.
You could indeed end an hotkey label with exit
, and it would be the same as ending it with return
.
From the documentation:
"If there is no caller to which to return, Return
will do an Exit
instead.".
I guess it's just convention to end hotkey labels with return
.
So basically said, there is difference between the two, if return
isn't about to do an exit
.
Well when would this be?
For example:
MsgBox, 1
function()
MsgBox, 3
return ;this does an exit
function()
{
MsgBox, 2
return ;this does a return
}
The first return
has no caller to which to return to, so it will do an exit
.
The second return
however does have a caller to return to do, so it will return there, and then execute the 3rd message box.
If we replaced the second return with an exit
, the current thread would just be exited and the 3rd message box would never have been shown.
Here's the same exact example with legacy labels:
MsgBox, 1
gosub, label
MsgBox, 3
return ;this does an exit
label:
MsgBox, 2
return ;this does a return
I'm showing this, because they're very close to hotkey labels, and hotkey labels were something you were wondering a lot about.
In this specific example, if the line MsgBox, 3
didn't exist, replacing the second return
with an exit
would produce the same end result. But only because code execution is about to end anyway on the first return
.
If return
doesn't play like a closing bracket, then why does it appear in many places one expects a closing bracket?
In AHK v1, hotkeys and hotstrings work like labels, and labels are legacy. Labels don't care about { }
s like modern functions do.
So we need something to stop the code execution. Return
does that.
Consider the following example:
c::
MsgBox, % "Hotkey triggered!"
gosub, run_chrome
;code execution not ended
n::
MsgBox, % "Hotkey triggered!`nRunning notepad"
Run, notepad
;code execution not ended
run_chrome:
MsgBox, % "Running chrome"
run, chrome
WinWait, ahk_exe chrome.exe
WinMove, ahk_exe chrome.exe, , 500, 500
;code execution not ended
show_system_uptime:
MsgBox, % "System uptime: " A_TickCount " ms"
;code execution not ended
We're not ending code execution at any of the labels. Because of this, code execution will bleed into other parts of the code, in this case, into the other labels.
Try running the hotkeys and see how code execution bleeds into the other labels.
Because of this, the code execution needs to be ended somehow.
If using { }
was supported by labels, it would indeed be the solution to keep the code execution where it needs to be.
And in fact AHK v2 hotkeys and hotstrings are no longer labels (they're only lookalikes). In v2 using { }
is actually the correct way (the script wont even run if you don't use them).
See hotkeys from the AHK v2 documentation.