0

I'm trying to use dplyr::mutate() in combination with purrr::map() to create a "recipe" object with recipes::recipe().

If I do it out of tibble context this works fine:

library(rsample)
library(recipe)

iris_split <- initial_split(iris, prop = 0.6)
data_set_training <- training(iris_split)

recipe_standalone <- recipe(x = data_set_training, Species ~ .) # works

By contrast:

library(tibble)
library(dplyr)
library(purrr)
library(tidyr)

tibble(subset_training = data_set_training) %>%
  nest(subset_training = subset_training) %>%
  mutate(iris_recipe = map(.x = subset_training, .f = ~recipe(x = .x, Species ~ .))) # doesn't work

Error: Problem with mutate() column iris_recipe.
i iris_recipe = map(.x = subset_training, .f = ~recipe(x = .x, Species ~ .)).
x object 'Species' not found

How can I use map() to create a new list-column that contains the "recipe" object?

Desired output
To demonstrate, I want to get this exactly:

desired_output <- 
  tibble(subset_training = list(data_set_training),
         iris_recipe = list(recipe_standalone))

## # A tibble: 1 x 2
##   subset_training iris_recipe
##   <list>          <list>     
## 1 <df [90 x 5]>   <recipe>
Emman
  • 3,695
  • 2
  • 20
  • 44

1 Answers1

3

You've created funky structure the way you are nesting. You have put a dataframe as a column and then nested it, so pulling it, you actually just still have this strange 90x1 data frame column.

tibble(subset_training = data_set_training) %>%
  nest(subset_training = subset_training) %>%
  pull(subset_training) %>%
  first()
#> # A tibble: 90 × 1
#>    subset_training$Sepal.Length $Sepal.Width $Petal.Length $Petal.Width $Species
#>                           <dbl>        <dbl>         <dbl>        <dbl> <fct>   
#>  1                          6.3          3.3           6            2.5 virgini…
#>  2                          6            2.2           4            1   versico…
#>  3                          5.7          2.8           4.5          1.3 versico…
#>  4                          7.2          3.6           6.1          2.5 virgini…
#>  5                          5            3.5           1.3          0.3 setosa  
#>  6                          5.1          3.8           1.6          0.2 setosa  
#>  7                          7.2          3.2           6            1.8 virgini…
#>  8                          5.7          4.4           1.5          0.4 setosa  
#>  9                          4.4          2.9           1.4          0.2 setosa  
#> 10                          5.2          3.4           1.4          0.2 setosa  
#> # … with 80 more rows

Here's how you should be nesting it.

data_set_training %>%
  nest(subset_training = everything()) %>%
  pull(subset_training) %>%
  first()
#> # A tibble: 90 × 5
#>    Sepal.Length Sepal.Width Petal.Length Petal.Width Species   
#>           <dbl>       <dbl>        <dbl>       <dbl> <fct>     
#>  1          6.3         3.3          6           2.5 virginica 
#>  2          6           2.2          4           1   versicolor
#>  3          5.7         2.8          4.5         1.3 versicolor
#>  4          7.2         3.6          6.1         2.5 virginica 
#>  5          5           3.5          1.3         0.3 setosa    
#>  6          5.1         3.8          1.6         0.2 setosa    
#>  7          7.2         3.2          6           1.8 virginica 
#>  8          5.7         4.4          1.5         0.4 setosa    
#>  9          4.4         2.9          1.4         0.2 setosa    
#> 10          5.2         3.4          1.4         0.2 setosa    
#> # … with 80 more rows

Then you get the results you're looking for:

data_set_training %>%
  nest(subset_training = everything()) %>%
  mutate(iris_recipe = map(
    .x = subset_training,
    .f = ~recipe(x = .x, Species ~ .)
    ))
#> # A tibble: 1 × 2
#>   subset_training   iris_recipe
#>   <list>            <list>     
#> 1 <tibble [90 × 5]> <recipe>
caldwellst
  • 5,719
  • 6
  • 22