Using a Published var to observe a switch case in a Publisher with Combine

Question

I have an enum case which is a @Published var in an ObservableObject class. What I'm trying to do is observe changes to the term var defined below and update an annualRate publisher.

Below is the @Published var

@Published var term: MortgageTerm = .thirtyYear

The MortgageTerm enum is defined as follows:

public enum MortgageType: Int, CaseIterable {
    case tenYear     = 10
    case fifteenYear = 15
    case twentyYear  = 20
    case thirtyYear  = 30
}

I'm trying to get this annualRate defined so it observes changes to the term var above:

public lazy var annualRate: AnyPublisher<Double, Never> = {
    var output: Double
    $term
        .map { switchCase -> Double in
            switch switchCase {
            case .tenYear:
                output = self.rates.tenYearFix
            case .fifteenYear:
                output = self.rates.fifteenYearFix
            case .twentyYear:
                output = self.rates.twentyYearFix
            case .thirtyYear:
                output = self.rates.thirtyYearFix
            }
            
            return output * 0.01
        }
        // FIXME: Result of call to `eraseToAnyPublisher()` is unused
        .eraseToAnyPublisher()
}()

I'm getting this warning at the line for .eraseToAnyPublisher(). What am I mucking up and how do I fix it?

This is where the rates are coming from:

private lazy var rates: AverageRate = {
    let rateMock = AverageRate(thirtyYearFha: 2.873,
                                thirtyYearVa: 2.858,
                                tenYearFix: 2.068,
                                fifteenYearFix: 2.358,
                                thirtyYearFix: 3.054,
                                fiveOneArm: 2.898,
                                sevenOneArm: 2.972,
                                twentyYearFix: 2.756)
    
    return rateMock
}()

score 1 · Accepted Answer · answered Sep 21 '21 at 02:42

Right now, you don't have a return statement inside your annualRate { }. You have two statements -- one defining output and the second creating the publisher. If you just had one statement, it would be considered an implicit return and you wouldn't have the error.

I think you can refactor very slightly and get rid of the var output since every value is getting modified by the same amount. So, you can just tack on another map:

public lazy var annualRate: AnyPublisher<Double, Never> = {
    $term
        .map { switchCase -> Double in
            switch switchCase {
            case .tenYear:
                return self.rates.tenYearFix
            case .fifteenYear:
                return self.rates.fifteenYearFix
            case .twentyYear:
                return self.rates.twentyYearFix
            case .thirtyYear:
                return self.rates.thirtyYearFix
            }
        }
        .map { $0 * 0.01 }
        .eraseToAnyPublisher()
}()

Now, there's just one statement, which is considered an implicit return and nothing is unused.

Thank you so much! I've been fiddling with this longer than I care to admit today. I need to get used to the `Combine` way of doing things — Adrian, Sep 21 '21 at 02:47
No problem. You also could have moved the `var output` *inside* of the `map` closure, but it is a little Swift-ier to just do the second `map`, I think. The implicit return is not Combine specific, but is a more recent Swift feature. — jnpdx, Sep 21 '21 at 02:51

Using a Published var to observe a switch case in a Publisher with Combine

1 Answers1