In code that uses doxygen comments, we have this:
/// @see @ref Foo::Bar()
This generates a "See also" section in doxygen with an explicit link to the Foo::Bar() class/method.
But with clang-tidy, this comment generates an error:
example.h:70:12: error empty paragraph passed to '@see' command [clang-diagnostic-documentation]
(First time I've see a code comment generate a compiler error!)
Is it really invalid to have a @ref as the content of the @see? Or is the @ confusing clang-tidy?
