0

Given the following array:

// use strings only in the form <protocol>-<port>
ports: [
  'tcp-1514',
  'tcp-8080',
  'tcp-8443',
],

I'm trying to write jsonnet to split each element of the array to generate this object (represented here in yaml):

ports:
- name: "tcp-1514"
  containerPort: 1514
  protocol: "tcp"
- name: "tcp-8080"
  containerPort: 8080
  protocol: "tcp"
- name: "tcp-8443"
  containerPort: 8443
  protocol: "tcp"

I've tried several iterations of array comprehension to do this, mind you I'm brand new to jsonnet. The latest iteration was something like:

ports: [
  {
    local proto, port ::= std.split(port_obj, '-');
    name: port_obj,
    containerPort: port,
    protocol: proto,
  } for port_obj in $.sharedConfig.ports,
]

where $.sharedConfig.ports is the ports assignment. The problem is local proto, port ::= std.split(port_obj, '-');. I'm not sure this is valid code. The interpreter is poopooing it and I can't find any examples or documentation showing that this is valid.

Ultimately, if it's not valid then I'll have to split() twice, but that would be unfortunate. For instance, this works:

{
  local ports = ['tcp-1514', 'tcp-8080', 'tcp-8443',],

  ports: [
    local port = std.split(name,'-')[1];
    local proto = std.split(name,'-')[0];
  {

    name: name,
    protocol: proto,
    containerPort: port,
  }
  for name in ports],
}

which yields:

{
   "ports": [
      {
         "containerPort": "1514",
         "name": "tcp-1514",
         "protocol": "tcp"
      },
      {
         "containerPort": "8080",
         "name": "tcp-8080",
         "protocol": "tcp"
      },
      {
         "containerPort": "8443",
         "name": "tcp-8443",
         "protocol": "tcp"
      }
   ]
}

and YAML:

---
ports:
- containerPort: '1514'
  name: tcp-1514
  protocol: tcp
- containerPort: '8080'
  name: tcp-8080
  protocol: tcp
- containerPort: '8443'
  name: tcp-8443
  protocol: tcp

...but I really dislike the two-line variable assignment. The more I've tested this, the more I believe I'm right determining that the single-line assignment is not doable.

Anyone able to show me how I'm wrong, I'd truly appreciate it.

Jim
  • 1,499
  • 1
  • 24
  • 43

1 Answers1

1

It may look like a simple answer (that you may have already considered), but well here it goes: using a single local var to hold the split() result, then refer to it in fields' assignments ->

Simple answer:

{
  local ports = ['tcp-1514', 'tcp-8080', 'tcp-8443'],

  ports: [
    local name_split = std.split(name, '-');
    {

      name: name,
      protocol: name_split[0],
      containerPort: name_split[1],
    }
    for name in ports
  ],
}

Obfuscated answer (no interim local w/split() result):

// Return a map from zipping arr0 (keys) and arr1 (values)
local zipArrays(arr0, arr1) = std.foldl(
  // Merge each (per-field) object into a single obj
  function(x, y) x + y,
  // create per-field object, e.g. { name: <name> },
  std.mapWithIndex(function(i, x) { [arr0[i]]: x }, arr1),
  {},
);

{
  local ports = ['tcp-1514', 'tcp-8080', 'tcp-8443'],
  // Carefully ordered set of fields to "match" against: [name] + std.split(...)
  local vars = ['name', 'protocol', 'containerPort'],

  ports: [
    zipArrays(vars, [name] + std.split(name, '-'))
    for name in ports
  ],
}
jjo
  • 2,595
  • 1
  • 8
  • 16
  • 1
    I suppose this indirectly answers the question such that there is no way to assign multiple variables in one line from `split()`. – Jim Aug 27 '21 at 18:29
  • 1
    @Jim well ... there would be a way should there be a `zipArrays()` stdlib function (there's none), I added a 2nd _obfuscated_ answer that implements this function and uses it, in case it helps as reference. – jjo Aug 27 '21 at 20:22