I don't seem to understand the issue with serving static files in Python apps, for example Django. Now I am reading a documentation of WhiteNoise and first question is why it was developed in the first place? I mean what problem it solves? Why we can't save all the static files in /static folder and copy it to hosting.
Asked
Active
Viewed 220 times
2
-
1You can, but then you should configure Apache/nginx/other webserver to serve these files. Django by default does not serve static/media files, because it will likely be slower, and less secure. – Willem Van Onsem Aug 24 '21 at 11:26
-
Django server was not developed with a view of serving static files – Bartosz Karwacki Aug 24 '21 at 11:30
1 Answers
3
I don't seem to understand the issue with serving static files in Python apps, for example Django.
As is specified in the Django documentation on managing static files:
This method is grossly inefficient and probably insecure, so it is unsuitable for production.
Indeed, Django's views to serve static files are likely not very efficient. A webserver will typically cache a certain amount of files, use compression to send these to the browser (if the browser accepts this), etc. Django's views to serve static/media files are not designed to be competitive with a webserver like apache/nginx.
Even if that is solved, it using a signle server to serve static content is not a good idea. Often Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) are used to find a server close to the client that can serve these files.
The Django documentation therefore contains articles to deploy static files on a dedicated server and how to configure this server.
The whitenoise package is simply a best effort attempt to serve these files with a Python view. Python is more designed to reduce programmer time, not processing time, so while whitenoise is efficient, very likely it can not compete with CDN.
Willem Van Onsem
- 443,496
- 30
- 428
- 555