I am rendering a single mesh test object that contains 8000 cubes, 1 monkey, and 1 plane. I checked normals and winding orders. all seems correct for mesh.
if I render a single instance, the depth buffer works correctly. if I render using instanced when instant number increase depth buffer doesn't work correctly.
//Depth Attachment
//Create Depth Image
depthImage = new Image(
physicalDevice_,
logicalDevice_,
VK_IMAGE_TYPE_2D,
depthFormat,
VK_IMAGE_TILING_OPTIMAL,
swapChainExtent.width,
swapChainExtent.height,
1,
sampleCount_, //do we really need to sample depth????
VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_UNDEFINED,
VK_IMAGE_USAGE_DEPTH_STENCIL_ATTACHMENT_BIT,
VK_MEMORY_PROPERTY_DEVICE_LOCAL_BIT);
depthImageView = new ImageView(
logicalDevice_,
VK_IMAGE_VIEW_TYPE_2D,
depthImage->handle,
depthFormat,
1,
VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_DEPTH_BIT);
//Render pass Depth Attachment
VkAttachmentDescription depthAttachment{};
depthAttachment.format = depthFormat;
depthAttachment.samples = VK_SAMPLE_COUNT_1_BIT;
depthAttachment.loadOp = VK_ATTACHMENT_LOAD_OP_CLEAR;
depthAttachment.storeOp = VK_ATTACHMENT_STORE_OP_DONT_CARE;
depthAttachment.stencilLoadOp = VK_ATTACHMENT_LOAD_OP_DONT_CARE;
depthAttachment.stencilStoreOp = VK_ATTACHMENT_STORE_OP_DONT_CARE;
depthAttachment.initialLayout = VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_UNDEFINED;
depthAttachment.finalLayout = VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_DEPTH_STENCIL_ATTACHMENT_OPTIMAL;
//Graphics Pipeline
VkPipelineDepthStencilStateCreateInfo depthStencil{};
depthStencil.sType = VK_STRUCTURE_TYPE_PIPELINE_DEPTH_STENCIL_STATE_CREATE_INFO;
depthStencil.depthTestEnable = VK_TRUE;
depthStencil.depthWriteEnable = VK_TRUE;
depthStencil.depthCompareOp = VK_COMPARE_OP_LESS;
depthStencil.depthBoundsTestEnable = VK_FALSE;
depthStencil.minDepthBounds = 0.0f; // Optional
depthStencil.maxDepthBounds = 1.0f; // Optional
depthStencil.stencilTestEnable = VK_FALSE;
depthStencil.front = {}; // Optional
depthStencil.back = {}; // Optional
Below the screen is the view from the 100th instance of that mesh. The higher the instance number, the more the depth buffer deteriorates. The result is still the same if I use a different model.
What am I missing?