A small intro to my question.
I want to plot a sound file with numpy in dB. Just doing 20 * np.log10(arr)
doesn't work because of negative numbers.
So I was looking into using np.where()
. because np.where()
is part of ufunc
I just want to do it in that way (easier and more readable than using brackets).
I had some difficulties with it (unexpected results with a small test of random numbers). So I updated to latest version of numpy (was 1.18.x and is now 1.19.1).
Also I updated Spyder to 4.1.4.
So I did the following steps in the console for checking. I also added comments for some steps.
In [1]: import numpy as np
In [2]: a = np.round(np.random.rand(10) * 3, 0)
In [3]: a
Out[3]: array([2., 1., 2., 1., 1., 3., 2., 0., 2., 1.])
In [4]: tf = np.where(a==2, True, False)
In [5]: b = np.power(a,3, where=np.where(a==2, True, False))
In [6]: b
Out[6]:
array([8. , 1.42180731, 8. , 1.31799691, 1.01436297,
2.82985094, 8. , 0.35036821, 8. , 0.73520376])
In [7]: np.power(a,3, where=tf)
Out[7]: array([8., 1., 8., 1., 1., 3., 8., 0., 8., 1.])
In[8]: np.power(a,3, where=np.where(a==2, True, False))
Out[8]: array([8., 1., 8., 1., 1., 3., 8., 0., 8., 1.])
So when just calculating in the console it looks fine, but when using a variable the original values messed up.
In[9]: b=np.power(a,3, where=tf)
In[10]: b
Out[10]:
array([8. , 1.42180731, 8. , 1.31799691, 1.01436297,
2.82985094, 8. , 0.35036821, 8. , 0.73520376])
In[11]: np.log10(a, where=np.where(a>2, True, False))
Out[11]:
array([8. , 1.42180731, 8. , 1.31799691, 1.01436297,
0.47712125, 8. , 0.35036821, 8. , 0.73520376])
Because of weird results I checked if a
is still right
In[12]: a # Check if a still right
Out[12]: array([2., 1., 2., 1., 1., 3., 2., 0., 2., 1.])
Looks like it is. So I tried np.log10()
next. Check what happens:
In[13]: np.log10(a, where=np.where(a>2, True, False))
Out[13]:
array([2. , 1. , 2. , 1. , 1. ,
0.47712125, 2. , 0. , 2. , 1. ])
In[14]: c = np.log10(a, where=np.where(a>2, True, False))
In[15]: c
Out[15]:
array([2. , 1. , 2. , 1. , 1. ,
0.47712125, 2. , 0. , 2. , 1. ])
somehow with c
(log10) everything works / looks fine. So I removed b (I use spyder so I removed it from the variable explorer).
Then I recreated b
In[16]: b = np.power(a, 3, where=np.where(a==2, True, False))
In[17]: b
Out[17]: array([8., 1., 8., 1., 1., 3., 8., 0., 8., 1.])
In[18]: b1 = np.power(a, 3, where=tf)
In[19]: b1
Out[19]:
array([8.00000000e+000, 1.82804289e-322, 8.00000000e+000, 0.00000000e+000,
0.00000000e+000, 6.52741159e-038, 8.00000000e+000, 7.63251534e+169,
8.00000000e+000, 1.23967276e+224])
So I can't follow why this is the case. Did I do something wrong? (If yes please explain). Is this a bug in Numpy?
Edit: I have occurence on multiple laptops. So i created a mini script what should do the trick if it is on your pc / laptop. One adition before the script i use anaconda on all my machines for if that matters.
a = np.round(np.random.rand(10) * 3, 0)
tf = np.where(a==2, True, False)
b = np.power(a, 3, where=np.where(a==2, True, False))
b1 = np.power(a, 3, where=tf)
c = np.log10(a, where=np.where(a>2, True, False))
bits = 16
linarr = np.arange(2 ** bits) - 2 ** (bits - 1)
logarr = np.copy(linarr)
logarr = 20 * np.log10(logarr, where=np.where(linarr > 0, True, False))
I would expect that at least for the logarr
i get something in the following direction array([-32768, -32767,-32766, ... , 0, ... 90.3085, 90.3087])
but i get array([1.76e-314, 1.72-314, 2.12e-312, ... , 0, ... 90.3085, 90.3087])