Im trying to design the NDPA for the following grammar. I'm confused. Can you help me?
∑ = {a,b}
G = (V,∑,R,S)
V = {S,T,X}
S -> aTXb
T -> XTS|ε
X -> a|b
Im trying to design the NDPA for the following grammar. I'm confused. Can you help me?
∑ = {a,b}
G = (V,∑,R,S)
V = {S,T,X}
S -> aTXb
T -> XTS|ε
X -> a|b
There are at least two approaches: try to figure out what the language is and then write down an efficient PDA that works for that language; or, if you're lazy, you can cheat and use the construction that proves NPDAs are at least as powerful as CFGs. Let's do the latter, since this language doesn't appear to be super easy to describe.
To use the construction, build a NPDA that does the following:
This construction works by nondeterministically constructing every possible derivation in the grammar. NPDAs accept a string if and only if some nondeterministic path accepts it; and that would only happen for our NPDA if there were a valid derivation according to the grammar. By definition, the language of a grammar is exactly the set of strings that have a valid derivation, so we're done.