9

I am unable to understand the difference between the two. Though, I come to know that word_tokenize uses Penn-Treebank for tokenization purposes. But nothing on TweetTokenizer is available. For which sort of data should I be using TweetTokenizer over word_tokenize?

Mehul Gupta
  • 1,829
  • 3
  • 17
  • 33

1 Answers1

21

Well, both tokenizers almost work the same way, to split a given sentence into words. But you can think of TweetTokenizer as a subset of word_tokenize. TweetTokenizer keeps hashtags intact while word_tokenize doesn't.

I hope the below example will clear all your doubts...

from nltk.tokenize import TweetTokenizer
from nltk.tokenize import  word_tokenize
tt = TweetTokenizer()
tweet = "This is a cooool #dummysmiley: :-) :-P <3 and some arrows < > -> <-- @remy: This is waaaaayyyy too much for you!!!!!!"
print(tt.tokenize(tweet))
print(word_tokenize(tweet))

# output
# ['This', 'is', 'a', 'cooool', '#dummysmiley', ':', ':-)', ':-P', '<3', 'and', 'some', 'arrows', '<', '>', '->', '<--', '@remy', ':', 'This', 'is', 'waaaaayyyy', 'too', 'much', 'for', 'you', '!', '!', '!']
# ['This', 'is', 'a', 'cooool', '#', 'dummysmiley', ':', ':', '-', ')', ':', '-P', '<', '3', 'and', 'some', 'arrows', '<', '>', '-', '>', '<', '--', '@', 'remy', ':', 'This', 'is', 'waaaaayyyy', 'too', 'much', 'for', 'you', '!', '!', '!', '!', '!', '!']

You can see that word_tokenize has split #dummysmiley as '#' and 'dummysmiley', while TweetTokenizer didn't, as '#dummysmiley'. TweetTokenizer is built mainly for analyzing tweets. You can learn more about tokenizer from this link

Naveen Reddy Marthala
  • 2,622
  • 4
  • 35
  • 67
Darkknight
  • 1,716
  • 10
  • 23
  • 2
    In addition to this answer, aonther great tutorial on `TweetTokenizer` can also be found [here](https://berkeley-stat159-f17.github.io/stat159-f17/lectures/11-strings/11-nltk..html#First-pass) and focuses on problems with tokenizing social media data. – edesz Dec 18 '20 at 15:49