Over the decades, I've taken to painstakingly trying different fonts from different families to get a nice progression of sizes for xterm. The six that I found to be good in 2015 are prefixed by ~/.Xresources:
below. Since Windows 7 became unsupported and ye olde laptop was too worn out to migrate to Windows 10, I bought a new laptop and freshly installed Cygwin's X-windows. The formerly good fonts now generate errors, prefixed by Error:
below.
~/.Xresources: xterm*font: -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed--13-120-75-75-c-60-iso8859-1
Error: None
~/.Xresources: xterm*font1: -*-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-*-*-11-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Error: xterm: cannot load font "-B&H-LucidaTypewriter-medium-R-*-*-11-80-100-100-M-140-ISO10646-1"
~/.Xresources: xterm*font2: -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--13-120-75-75-c-70-iso8859-1
Error: xterm: cannot load font "-Misc-Fixed-medium-R-*-*-13-120-75-75-C-140-ISO10646-1"
~/.Xresources: xterm*font3: -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--13-120-75-75-c-80-iso8859-1
Error: xterm: cannot load font "-Misc-Fixed-medium-R-*-*-13-120-75-75-C-160-ISO10646-1"
~/.Xresources: xterm*font4: -*-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-*-*-14-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Error: xterm: cannot load font "-B&H-LucidaTypewriter-medium-R-*-*-14-140-75-75-M-180-ISO10646-1"
~/.Xresources: xterm*font5: -b&h-lucidatypewriter-bold-r-normal-sans-14-*-*-*-m-*-*-*
Error: None
~/.Xresources: xterm*font6: -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--20-200-75-75-c-100-iso8859-1
Error: xterm: cannot load font "-Misc-Fixed-medium-R-*-*-20-200-75-75-C-200-ISO10646-1"
Other lines in ~/.Xresources
----------------------------
xterm*toolBar: false
xterm*background: rgb:00/00/66
xterm*foreground: White
Despite the errors generated when some of the above fonts are selected, the xterm still switches fonts, and I find the fonts to be good. I'm guessing that it's choosing some font with a very close specification.
If so, how can I find the full specification for the font that ends up being used? I want to use them in ~/.Xresources
.
If not, then what is happenning when I get the error message and the font still appears to switch?
Finally, once I've identified the fonts that are being switched to, is there an efficient way to find the Cygwin package that contains them?
Note the the following merely echos the information in my ~/.Xresources rather than displaying the fonts that are actually being used (assuming that they differ from what's in ~/.Xresources
, due to the errors):
appres XTerm xterm | grep -w xterm | grep font | sort
xrdb -query | grep -w xterm | grep font | sort
Troubleshooting with xterm -report-fonts
Thomas Dickey suggested xterm -report-fonts
, which reports loaded fonts to stdout
:
Loaded VTFonts(default)
fNorm: -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed--13-120-75-75-c-60-iso8859-1
fBold: -Misc-Fixed-bold-R-*-*-13-120-75-75-C-60-ISO8859-1
fWide: -Misc-Fixed-medium-R-*-*-13-120-75-75-C-120-ISO10646-1
fWBold: -Misc-Fixed-medium-R-*-*-13-120-75-75-C-120-ISO10646-1
Loaded VTFonts(default)
fNorm: -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed--13-120-75-75-c-60-iso8859-1
fBold: -Misc-Fixed-bold-R-*-*-13-120-75-75-C-60-ISO8859-1
fWide: -Misc-Fixed-medium-R-*-*-13-120-75-75-C-120-ISO10646-1
fWBold: -Misc-Fixed-medium-R-*-*-13-120-75-75-C-120-ISO10646-1
Loaded VTFonts(default)
fNorm: -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed--13-120-75-75-c-60-iso8859-1
fBold: -Misc-Fixed-bold-R-*-*-13-120-75-75-C-60-ISO8859-1
fWide: -Misc-Fixed-medium-R-*-*-13-120-75-75-C-120-ISO10646-1
fWBold: -Misc-Fixed-medium-R-*-*-13-120-75-75-C-120-ISO10646-1
Loaded VTFonts(font1)
fNorm: -*-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-*-*-11-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
fBold: -*-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-*-*-11-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
fWide: -*-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-*-*-11-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
fWBold: -*-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-*-*-11-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Loaded VTFonts(font2)
fNorm: -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--13-120-75-75-c-70-iso8859-1
fBold: -Misc-Fixed-bold-R-*-*-13-120-75-75-C-70-ISO8859-1
fWide: -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--13-120-75-75-c-70-iso8859-1
fWBold: -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--13-120-75-75-c-70-iso8859-1
Loaded VTFonts(font3)
fNorm: -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--13-120-75-75-c-80-iso8859-1
fBold: -Misc-Fixed-bold-R-*-*-13-120-75-75-C-80-ISO8859-1
fWide: -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--13-120-75-75-c-80-iso8859-1
fWBold: -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--13-120-75-75-c-80-iso8859-1
Loaded VTFonts(font4)
fNorm: -*-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-*-*-14-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
fBold: -B&H-LucidaTypewriter-bold-R-*-*-14-140-75-75-M-90-ISO8859-1
fWide: -*-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-*-*-14-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
fWBold: -*-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-*-*-14-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Loaded VTFonts(font5)
fNorm: -b&h-lucidatypewriter-bold-r-normal-sans-14-*-*-*-m-*-*-*
fBold: -B&H-LucidaTypewriter-bold-R-*-*-14-140-75-75-M-90-ISO8859-1
fWide: -b&h-lucidatypewriter-bold-r-normal-sans-14-*-*-*-m-*-*-*
fWBold: -b&h-lucidatypewriter-bold-r-normal-sans-14-*-*-*-m-*-*-*
Loaded VTFonts(font6)
fNorm: -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--20-200-75-75-c-100-iso8859-1
fBold: -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--20-200-75-75-c-100-iso8859-1
fWide: -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--20-200-75-75-c-100-iso8859-1
fWBold: -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--20-200-75-75-c-100-iso8859-1
Loaded VTFonts(default)
fNorm: -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed--13-120-75-75-c-60-iso8859-1
fBold: -Misc-Fixed-bold-R-*-*-13-120-75-75-C-60-ISO8859-1
fWide: -Misc-Fixed-medium-R-*-*-13-120-75-75-C-120-ISO10646-1
fWBold: -Misc-Fixed-medium-R-*-*-13-120-75-75-C-120-ISO10646-1
I added blank lines to separate redundant reports of
VTFonts(default)
from the centrally positioned main body of the
output. I also removed all the detailed parameters associatd with
each X logical font description (XLFD).
What seems to be happening is that each time I select an xterm
font
VTFonts(fonti) where fonti depends on the font chosen
(either default
or font1
through font6
), xterm
reports 4 font
variations for the font. The font variations are named fNorm
,
fBold
, fWide
, and fWBold
.
For all
xterm
fonts, variationfNorm
always matches the XLFD in~/.Xresources
.Variations
fWide
andfWBold
matchfNorm
for allxterm
fonts exceptdefault
Variation
fWBold
differs fromfNorm
for allxterm
fonts exceptfont1
andfont6
Selecting
xterm
fonti generates an error about inabilty to load an apparently related font, where i is one of 1, 2, 3, 4, 6. These are the errors reported in the original question. The related font's XLFD matches none of the font variants (fNorm
,fBold
,fWide
,fWBold
)
From these observations, it seems that the originally posted XLFD
errors might be unrelated to the ~/.Xresources
fonts. The XLFDs
don't match any of the font variants reported by xterm either.
Without knowing enough about what goes on under the hood, it is
possible in my mind that xterm might try to load some of XLFDs in the
error messages, and being unable to, settles on the XLFDs reported
using xterm -report-fonts
.
I just find it odd that I'm encountering this behaviour. Over the decades, I've never had error messages about XLFDs that I did not specify. Perhaps X11 has evolved to look for XLFDs related to the ones I specified.