#include <functional>
#include <iostream>
template<typename T>
void test( std::function< void ( const T& ) > f )
{
T val {};
f( val );
std::cout << "std::function" << std::endl;
}
template<typename T>
void test( void(*f) ( const T& ) )
{
T val {};
f( val );
std::cout << "function pointer" << std::endl;
}
int main()
{
auto capturing_var { 0 };
// Works because implicit conversion to function pointer isn't applied when lambda is capturing
test< int >( [ capturing_var ]( const int& x ) { } );
// Doesn't work because implicitly convertible to function pointer and makes ambiguity
// I want this line to work somehow, how can i make it worked with same client code ? Is it possible ?
test< int >( []( const int& x ) { } );
// This line is finer if it works, but in this case compiler cannot deduce T and also ambiguous if it could
test( []( const int& x ) { } );
// Works because of unary + operator so conversion to function ptr and i dont need to specify T
test( +[]( const int& x ) { } );
return 0;
}
Actually I just want this code to work without changing anything in main()
, but I'm not sure whether it is possible.
I can omit overloaded function which takes function pointer, then it would work but in that case I need to specify what T
is.
Note: I need T
to be deduced.