14

I have an API call that returns a certain amount of ids. Each of these ids are used to make a new api call. The results of these API calls need to be combined into a single object.

At first I used a loop inside the .pipe(map) operator of the first api call. In this loop I did the second api calls, and in the .pipe(map) operator in each of these calls I would edit a variable in my angular component.

This wasn't very pretty, and I was actually wondering if this is thread safe. I know javascript is single threaded, but it doesn't seem very safe to have multiple asynchronous processes messing with the same global variable.

after that I just stored the observable returned by the second api call in an array by looping over the returned Ids by apiCall1, and used forkJoin to subscribe and handle each result accordingly (see example).

This isn't very pretty however, and I was wondering if there's an operator I can use in my pipe for this?

So instead of (pseudocode):

  .pipe(
      map(ids=> {

        let observables = []
        for (const id of ids) {
         observables.push(this.service.getSomeStuff(id));
        }

        forkJoin(...observables).subscribe(dataArray) => {
          for (data of dataArray) {
            //Do something
          }
        });

      }),
      takeWhile(() => this.componentActive),
      catchError(error => {
        console.log(error);
        return throwError(error);
      })
    )
    .subscribe();

Is there an operator that makes it something like this:

  .pipe(
      map(ids=> {

        let observables = []
        for (const id of ids) {
         observables.push(this.service.getSomeStuff(id));
        }

      return observables
      }),
      forkJoin(dataArray => {
          for (data of dataArray) {
            //Do something
          }
        });
      takeWhile(() => this.componentActive),
      catchError(error => {
        console.log(error);
        return throwError(error);
      })
    )
    .subscribe();
BartKrul
  • 577
  • 1
  • 8
  • 21

3 Answers3

10

This is what you can do:

sourceObservable$.pipe(
  // depends on your need here you can use mergeMap as well
  switchMap(ids => {
    const observables = ids.map(i => this.service.getSomeStuff(id));
    return forkJoin(observables);
  }),
  tap(joined => {
    // joined will be an array of values of the observables in the same
    // order as you pushed in forkJoin
    for (data of joined) {
      // do something
    }
  }),
  takeWhile(() => this.componentActive),
  catchError(error => {
    console.log(error);
    return throwError(error);
  })
)
.subscribe();
gsc
  • 1,559
  • 1
  • 13
  • 17
user2216584
  • 5,387
  • 3
  • 22
  • 29
  • 4
    it would be better to eliminate the `tap` and move that code into the call to `subscribe`. – Brandon Jun 17 '19 at 15:09
  • 3
    @Brandon Yes, that's also the same thing. It is just to demonstrate what can be done in the observable pipeline. Personally, In Angular app, I rarely subscribe. I heavily use `async` pipe to let angular take care of subscription management itself. Although in subscribe() method also its absolutely fine. BTW thanks for the suggestion..:) – user2216584 Jun 17 '19 at 15:14
  • I agree with Brandon, there are rarely good reasons why you should not use pure functions – Davy Jun 17 '19 at 15:57
  • 1
    @Davy using `tap` operator callback is also a pure function. Again as I said - using subscribe() is also absolutely fine. – user2216584 Jun 17 '19 at 16:00
5
combineLatest(...observables)

will only emit after all observables have emitted and you will have an array of the results.

Adrian Brand
  • 20,384
  • 4
  • 39
  • 60
1

Instead of modifying your data at once using for, why don't you do it as the data is received? Something like this.

source$.pipe(
  mergeMap(ids => from(ids)),
  mergeMap(id => this.service.getSomeStuff(id)),
  tap(data => //do someting with the data);
  takeWhile(() => this.componentActive),
  catchError(error => {
    console.log(error);
    return throwError(error);
  }),
  toArray(), --> this create the array of all the values received.
)
.subscribe(data => //returns array of modified data);
emkay
  • 777
  • 8
  • 19