I have some data class which is expensive to copy, but must be mutable, as it is frequently updated according to events. I also need a multi-index container to hold many such classes. I'm trying to set it up using boost::multi_index. For example:
struct MutableAndExpensiveToCopy {
int some_value;
std::map<int, std::string> some_huge_map;
std::map<int, std::string> an_even_bigger_map;
}
struct CanBeMultiIndexed
{
// "Payload" - its fields will never be used as indices
MutableAndExpensiveToCopy data;
// Indexes
int id;
std::string label;
}
typedef multi_index_container<
CanBeMultiIndexed,
indexed_by<
ordered_unique<member<CanBeMultiIndexed, int, &CanBeMultiIndexed::id>>,
ordered_non_unique<member<CanBeMultiIndexed,std::string,&CanBeMultiIndexed::label>>
>
> MyDataContainer;
My problem is that multi_index treats elements in the container as constants (in order to keep the integrity of all of the indices). For example, the following won't compile:
void main() {
// put some data in the container
MyDataContainer container;
CanBeMultiIndexed e1(1, "one"); // conto'r not shown in class definition for brevity
CanBeMultiIndexed e2(2, "two");
container.insert(e1);
container.insert(e2);
// try to modify data
MyDataContainer::nth_index<1>::type::iterator iter = container.get<1>().find(1);
iter->data.some_value = 5; // constness violation
}
I cannot use the replace()
method, as it is expensive to copy the payload class.
I'm aware of the modify()
method, but using it seems cumbersome, since in my real program, the "payload" class may contain numerous fields, and writing a functor for each and every one it out of the question.
Any suggestions?
EDIT: After some playing around, I've tried replacing the data element with a shared_ptr to MutableAndExpensiveToCopy
:
struct CanBeMultiIndexed
{
// "Payload" - its fields will never be used as indices
boost::shared_ptr<MutableAndExpensiveToCopy> data;
// Indexes
int id;
std::string label;
}
This worked, and I was able to compile my main()
including the data-modifying code:
void main() {
...
iter->data->some_value = 5; // this works
...
}
This pretty much gives me what I wanted, but I'm not sure why this works, so:
- Does this code does what I intended, or is there some caveat I'm missing?
- How come this works? Does the constness of the shared_ptr does not apply to its
->
operator?