Besides providing training data what your model should detect, it may also be helpful to provide negative data what it should not detect. Images without annotations implicitly say that anything in there is not what the model should detect.
Let's say you're training a model to detect yellow cabs. Of course you provide data with yellow cabs. But it also makes sense to include negative data containing yellow objects that aren't cabs as well as cars that aren't cabs. This prevents your network from learning that anything yellow is a cab, or any car is a cab.
Neural networks are a bit of black box, but from a theoretical viewpoint you could say that they somehow extract certain abstract features from their input. Based on the extracted features they determine (for instance) an object's class and position.
Training a neural network then means that the network learns to find abstract features relevant for determining the class and position of objects. The nature of neural networks makes it hard to understand what features it is learning. All we can see is that the neural network starts to behave according how we train it.
Without negative data a network may learn too abstract features. Then the network may find those features in other objects it should not detect. For instance, in our team we were training a YOLO network to detect certain plants. But one time we found that one of our networks also detected plants in an image with nothing but blocks.
Negative data provides more feedback for learning features. During the training process it may happen that the network starts learning too abstract features. But then chances are that the network starts to detect objects in the negative data. The training algorithm then sees that the network falsely detects objects and provides feedback.
Rohit refers to AlexeyAB's github page, stating that you should provide as many images of negative samples as you provide images with objects. Since AlexeyAB is one of the main contributors to YOLO, it probably won't hurt to follow his advice, unless you have clear evidence he's wrong.