The short answer is: there is no shorthand. Your code is good.
The really short answer is: it depends. ;)
If you think about the surrounding codebase you can come up with a different architecture overall.
You may as well pass null to the constructor
x = SomeClass(y);
and then give a reasonable default in your initializer list:
class SomeClass {
dynamic _value;
SomeClass(value) _value = value ?? '';
}
or throw an exception:
var nullError = Exception('Null value not allowed');
class SomeClass {
dynamic _value;
SomeClass(value) _value = value ?? (throw nullError);
}
though a more idiomatic way would be this:
class SomeClass {
dynamic _value;
SomeClass(value) {
ArgumentError.checkNotNull(value);
_value = value;
}
As I know nothing about the rest of your code, I cannot give you the right answer.
But I suggest you to ask yourself:
Where does this z value come from? What is its meaning?
(If you're in big project, you may use Dependency Injection or Factories.)
Maybe I have a view component, where empty strings are more useful than nulls?
These are some things I would ask myself.
But if you're hacking a quick script, this maybe a long shot.
You may have already finished your task by now, and maybe you really had no need for a shorthand in the first place.