While I'm ultimately trying to write an Enzyme test for the flow in this react router example: https://reacttraining.com/react-router/web/example/auth-workflow
import React from 'react';
import ReactDOM from 'react-dom';
import Enzyme, { shallow, mount } from 'enzyme';
import Adapter from 'enzyme-adapter-react-16';
import { MemoryRouter, Route, Switch, Link } from 'react-router-dom';
const Home = () => <div>Home</div>;
const MockComp = () => (
<div className="protected">
<nav>hi</nav>
Protected
</div>
);
const MockDenied = () => <div className="denied">Denied</div>;
test('Renders visited protected component if authorized', () => {
const wrapper = mount(
<MemoryRouter initialEntries={['/']}>
<div>
<Link to="/foo" />
<Switch>
<Route path="/" component={Home} />
<Route path="/401" component={MockDenied} />
<ProtectedRouteBasic
path="/foo"
auth={{ hasAuth: true }}
component={MockComp}
/>
</Switch>
</div>
</MemoryRouter>
);
wrapper.find('a').simulate('click', { button: 0 });
expect(wrapper.find('.protected').length).toEqual(1);
expect(wrapper.find('.denied').length).toEqual(0);
});
I've found a number of issues and have tried to peel away the complexity and then slowly reintroduce the elements that I've removed.
So I've landed on this test as what I will need to get working to proceed:
test('Clicking link will render component associated with path', () => {
const wrapper = mount(
<MemoryRouter>
<div>
<Link to="/foo" />
<Switch>
<Route path="/" component={Home} />
<Route path="/foo" component={MockComp} />
</Switch>
</div>
</MemoryRouter>
);
wrapper.find('a').simulate('click', { button: 0 });
expect(wrapper.find('.protected')).toHaveLength(1);
});
However, this test isn't working as expected as I expect the test to pass in its current state. I've read this thread to update my simulate
call to include the {button: 0}
as well as this thread about wrapping the entire router in a functional component, however, that option's not available to me as far as I know, since the framework I'm working with doesn't seem to allow for it. Additionally, I believe that that piece is immaterial to the issue I'm having. That said, any help would be much appreciated.