4

I want to make something similar to this, but I'd like to avoid proprietary platforms (flash). I'm relatively new to development and I'm willing to learn anything. I understand that some javascript frameworks like jQuery and MooTools are capable of some animation, but is this beyond their capability? What do you recommend?

thanks

Thomas G Henry LLC
  • 10,887
  • 8
  • 30
  • 32

9 Answers9

5

Take a look at John Resig's processing.js. No need to use raw jQuery when jQuery's primary author already done the work!

jdigital
  • 11,926
  • 4
  • 34
  • 51
3

You can use FlashDevelop for the IDE

http://osflash.org/flashdevelop

Also, you can use gnash as the player.

http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/

Brian Bolton
  • 3,633
  • 8
  • 35
  • 43
1

The more important question is, if you found such a platform would anyone be able to play it with software they already have installed?

BC.
  • 24,298
  • 12
  • 47
  • 62
1

What about Java or JavaFX? I actually don't know a whole lot about it but it's supposed to be for RIAs which puts it into the Flash and Silverlight class of technologies.

dtc
  • 10,136
  • 16
  • 78
  • 104
1

I know that SVG is capable of animation, but I don't know how widespread the support is or what tools support it.

Mark Ransom
  • 299,747
  • 42
  • 398
  • 622
0

To replicate the animation you pointed to would be very difficult in JQuery, but not impossible. Question is, are you up for the challenge?

I wouldn't recommend alternatives to Flash unless the app you are building is internal to your company and you can be sure everyone will have the necessary plugins installed.

cbp
  • 25,252
  • 29
  • 125
  • 205
0

Check out Processing.

Also check out the free Flex SDK, which allows you to write and compile Actionscript without the Flash IDE

Aaron
  • 838
  • 6
  • 5
0

You could use Moonlight, the open source clone of Silverlight.

John D. Cook
  • 29,517
  • 10
  • 67
  • 94
  • I believe Moonlight is only a player. You would still need to use Microsoft tools to create the content. – dtc Feb 13 '09 at 19:36
0

From the Java space:

  • JavaFX already had 100.000.000 downloads if you're worried about adoption.
  • Processing. You'd still have to worry about the download size. IMHO, processing is great for prototypes, but you have to do quite a lot of work to make the applet performant, especially when no animation is going.
Bill the Lizard
  • 398,270
  • 210
  • 566
  • 880
jamesh
  • 19,863
  • 14
  • 56
  • 96