The first claim is True. The second claim is False.
G_f denotes G residual network, c_f is the capacity in G_f.
This is the Ford fulkerson method, as I know it:
1) Define: f(u,v) = 0, for all (u,v) in E.
2) while there exits a path p from s to t, in G_f:
3) c_f(p) = min{c_f(e) : for all e in p}
4) for (u,v) in p:
5) if (u,v) in E:
6) f(u,v) += c_f(p)
7) else:
8) f(u,v) -= c_f(p)
By the end of the process, f is a maximum flow. (You can read the proof in "Introduction to Algorithm", By CLRS)
The running time of that algorithm is O(X(V+E)), X being the number of times the while loop iterates.
Now - we can find p, on line (2) using a BFS search. Such method, ensures that we iterate the while loop O(VE) times. This implementation is also known as Edmonds-Karp algorithm. Overall running time is, thus: O(VE*(E+V)).
This should answer your first question - We can always find the maximum flow by augmenting paths s-t in polynomial time.
About your second question:
Consider a graph G, where all capacities are of value 1. Clearly, the maximum flow value is less than |E|.
Since each iteration of the while loop increment the current value of flow f by a positive integer (by one actually. If you need a prove, go to the CLRS), we have that the while loop iterates at most |E| times. We thus have a running time of O(E*(E+V), regardless of how we choose the augmenting paths.
This graph contradict the second claim.