A type-safe alternative to Text.Printf
is the formatting package. Text.Printf.printf
does not ensure at compile-time that the number of formatting parameters aligns with the number of arguments and their types. Read Chris Done's article, What's wrong with printf? for examples.
An example usage:
{-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-}
import Formatting
map (uncurry $ formatToString ("Value: " % int % " " % int)) [(1,100), (2,350), ...]
map (\(x,y) -> formatToString ("Value: " % int % " " % int) x y) [(1,100), (2,350), ...]
It requires the GHC extension OverloadedStrings to function properly.
While formatToString ("Value: " % int % " " % int)
has the type Int -> Int -> String
, uncurrying it gives the type (Int, Int) -> String
of which the input type matches the elements in the list.
The rewriting process can be broken down; assuming f
= formatString ("Value: " ...)
,
map (\(x,y) -> f x y) ≡ map (\(x,y) -> uncurry f (x,y)) ≡ map (uncurry f)
That is, first you uncurry f to achieve the function that accepts tuples, and then you perform a regular Eta-conversion since \(x,y) -> uncurry f (x,y)
is equivalent to simply uncurry f
. To print each line in the result, use mapM_
:
mapM_ (putStrLn . uncurry $ formatToString ...) [(1,100), (2,350), ...]
If you run hlint YourFile.hs, these rewrites will be recommended to you.