I have a question regarding the interpretation of a plot created with the interplot function in R. The aim is to find out, what effect participation has on whether an individual migrates or not and how an individual’s wealth (HH_type
) changes this effect.
participation
is a continuous variable, HH_type
takes the value 1 for poor individuals, 2 for middle and 3 for rich individuals.
I estimated this model:
library(lme4)
Model_int1 <- glmer(migration ~ participation:HH_type + participation + HH_type + sex + age + education + hh_migrated + (1 | country/district),
data = migration_sudden,
family = binomial(link = "logit"))
and I got a negative and significant interaction.
To create a plot, I used the interplot
function:
library(interplot)
interplot(m = Model_int1, var1 = "participation", var2 = "HH_type") +
xlab("Wealth") +
ylab("Estimated Coefficient for Participation") +
theme_bw() +
ggtitle("Estimated Coefficient of Participation on migration by household wealth") +
theme(plot.title = element_text(face="bold")) +
geom_hline(yintercept = 0, linetype = "dashed")
and I get this plot:
Now, I am not sure how to interpret this plot. Is it right to say, that poor people are more likely to migrate if they have high opportunities to participate; for individuals with middle wealth, participation has no effect on whether they migrate or not and rich people are less likely to migrate if they have high opportunities to participate?