How to access variable dynamically inside an anonymous function/closure?

Question

To keep the global namespace clean, my JavaScript code is wrapped like this:

(function() {
    /* my code */
})();

Now I have some variables declared in this scope which I want to access using a variable variable name (e.g. the name is 'something' + someVar). In the global scope I'd simply use window['varname'], but obviously that doesn't work.

Is there a good way to do what I want? If not I could simply put those variables inside an object to use the array notation...

Note: eval('varname') is not an acceptable solution. So please don't suggest that.

Could you say more specifically what it is you want to do when you want to "access them dynamically"? Do you want to access them outside the function? That's not possible AFAIK. — joriki, Feb 05 '11 at 13:50
No, i just want to access them without hardcoding the variable name - but from inside my function. — ThiefMaster, Feb 05 '11 at 13:51
With "dynamically" i mean with a dynamically generated variable name. — ThiefMaster, Feb 05 '11 at 13:56

score 8 · Accepted Answer · answered Feb 05 '11 at 14:34

This is a good question because this doesn't point to the anonymous function, otherwise you would obviously just use this['something'+someVar]. Even using the deprecated arguments.callee doesn't work here because the internal variables aren't properties of the function. I think you will have to do exactly what you described by creating either a holder object...

(function() {
  var holder = { something1: 'one', something2: 2, something3: 'three' };

  for (var i = 1; i <= 3; i++) {
    console.log(holder['something'+i]);
  }
})();

yuxhuang · Answer 2 · 2011-02-05T14:24:54.570

2

(function(globals) {
    /* do something */
    globals[varname] = yourvar;
})(yourglobals);

edited Feb 05 '11 at 14:24

answered Feb 05 '11 at 13:52

yuxhuang

5,279
1
18
13

"To keep the global namespace clean" - so obviously I do not want to add it to the global namespace. – ThiefMaster Feb 05 '11 at 13:53
@ThiefMaster: `globals` doesn't necessarily mean global namespace -- it's just a parameter here and could very well be your own namespace. This doesn't deserve a -1. – casablanca Feb 05 '11 at 14:56
The initial answer only suggested `window[varname] = yourvar;` – ThiefMaster Feb 05 '11 at 16:14

hugomg · Answer 3 · 2011-02-05T14:53:44.457

1

evil solution/hack: Put the variable you need in a helper object obj and avoid having to change current uses to dot notation by using use with(obj){ your current code... }

edited Feb 05 '11 at 14:53

answered Feb 05 '11 at 14:47

hugomg

68,213
24
160
246

it should be avoided... it's a bit slower – gion_13 Mar 19 '11 at 16:26

How to access variable dynamically inside an anonymous function/closure?

3 Answers3

Linked

Related