I am trying to implement a One-To-Many relation using Squeryl, and following the instructions on their site.
The documentation gives the following example:
object SchoolDb extends Schema {
val courses = table[Course]
val subjects = table[Subject]
val subjectToCourses =
oneToManyRelation(subjects, courses).
via((s,c) => s.id === c.subjectId)
}
class Course(val subjectId: Long) extends SchoolDb2Object {
lazy val subject: ManyToOne[Subject] = SchoolDb.subjectToCourses.right(this)
}
class Subject(val name: String) extends SchoolDb2Object {
lazy val courses: OneToMany[Course] = SchoolDb.subjectToCourses.left(this)
}
I find that any calls to Course.subject
or Subject.courses
needs to be wrapped in a transaction. However, One of my goals in using an ORM is to hide these details from callers. As such, I don't want the calling code to have to wrap a call to these fields in a transaction.
It seems that if I modify the example to wrap the lazy init function in a transaction, like so:
class Subject(val name: String) extends SchoolDb2Object {
lazy val courses: OneToMany[Course] = {
inTransaction {
SchoolDb.subjectToCourses.left(this)
}
}
I get the following exception:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: no session is bound to current thread, a session must be created via Session.create
and bound to the thread via 'work' or 'bindToCurrentThread'
at scala.Predef$.error(Predef.scala:58)
at org.squeryl.Session$$anonfun$currentSession$1.apply(Session.scala:111)
at org.squeryl.Session$$anonfun$currentSession$1.apply(Session.scala:111)
at scala.Option.getOrElse(Option.scala:104)
at org.squeryl.Session$.currentSession(Session.scala:110)
at org.squeryl.dsl.AbstractQuery.org$squeryl$dsl$AbstractQuery$$_dbAdapter(AbstractQuery.scala:116)
at org.squeryl.dsl.AbstractQuery$$anon$1.<init>(AbstractQuery.scala:120)
at org.squeryl.dsl.AbstractQuery.iterator(AbstractQuery.scala:118)
at org.squeryl.dsl.DelegateQuery.iterator(DelegateQuery.scala:9)
But, like I said, if I wrap the caller in a transaction, then everything works.
So, how can I encapsulate the fact that this object is backed by a database in the object itself?