<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:contact="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/contact#">
<contact:Person rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/People/EM/contact#me">
<contact:fullName>Eric Miller</contact:fullName>
<contact:mailbox rdf:resource="mailto:em@w3.org"/>
<contact:personalTitle>Dr.</contact:personalTitle>
</contact:Person>
</rdf:RDF>
In this example, is the document RDF schema or pure RDF? The RDF Primer document states that:
"RDF itself provides no means for defining such application-specific
classes and properties. Instead, such classes and properties are described
as an RDF vocabulary, using extensions to RDF provided by RDF Schema... "
In above example, are the "Person" and "contact:fullName" etc are "application-specific classes and properties"? If that's the case, should RDF always be used together with RDF Schema?