I want to set the value of an associative array using the array index of the key/value pair. For example:
$my_arr = array( "bling" => "some bling", "bling2" => "lots O bling" );
$my_arr[1] = "not so much bling"; // Would change the value with key bling2.
How can this be accomplish this without using the key string?
Use array_keys.
$keys = array_keys($my_arr);
$my_arr[$keys[1]] = "not so much bling";
There is no correlation between numeric and associative index keys.
When you say you want to set the value of an associative array using the array index of the key/value, then you have to use the given key, setting $array[1] is not the same as setting $array['foo'].
Consider this array
print_r( array('foo', 'foo' => 'bar', 'baz', 'some' => 'value') );
This will give
Array
(
[0] => foo
[foo] => bar
[1] => baz
[some] => value
)
The foo is the second element in the array. That's the offset, but it has nothing to do with the index 1. As you can see, in that array above, index 1 is associated with baz. It is wrong to assume that just because foo is the first associative key it has anything to do with the actual numeric key 1. Just like some does not correlate to 2.
Likewise, for a mixed array like shown above, the solution with array_keys suggested elsewhere on this site will not work, because
print_r( array_keys(array('foo', 'foo' => 'bar', 'baz', 'some' => 'value')) );
will give
Array
(
[0] => 0
[1] => foo
[2] => 1
[3] => some
)
So when you do $array[$keys[1]] you are really doing $array['foo']. But if you wanted to access the second associative value in that array ('some'), you cannot do $array[$keys[2]] because that would evaluate to $array[1] and that's baz.
The Offset of an element is completely unrelated to it's key or value
print_r(
array(
100 => 'foo',
'foo' => 'bar',
50 => 'baz',
'some' => 'value'
)
);
really means
Array
( //key value offset/position
[100] => foo // 0
[foo] => bar // 1
[50] => baz // 2
[some] => value // 3
)
which means the element at offset 0 is foo although it's key is 100. If you want to extract elements from an array by offset, you have to use
$third = array_splice($array, 2, 1);
echo $third[0]; // baz
This would create an array holding only the element at the third position.
Or you could use an ArrayIterator. The ArrayIterator implements a Seekable interface that lets you seek to a specific position/offset in the array and then fetch that:
$iterator = new ArrayIterator($array);
$iterator->seek(3);
echo $iterator->current(); // value
Whilst array_keys() allows access to the nth key, array_values will give you the nth value.
<?php
$array = [
0 => 'Zero',
'1' => 'One',
'Two' => 'Two',
];
echo array_values($array)[2];
?>
will output 'Two'.
Is there an advantage of one over the other? Well, the only minor one I can see is the number of array accesses.
With array_keys() you need to 3.
With array_values(), you only need 2.
But, on the other hand, keys are normally smaller and the data could be hugely nested, so, on balance, using the array_keys() is probably safer.
If the array is large, both array_keys and array_values will be wasteful since they will allocate a new array the same size as the original, just to get the nth key (or value).
array_slice accepts an integer offset and works on associative arrays. You can use it to get (and set) the nth key in constant time.
// This will at most allocate 2 temporary arrays of 1 element each
$key = array_keys(array_slice($array, $n, 1, true))[0];
$array[$key] = $value;
Try this. It works for you.
$result= array_values($my_arr); // Array with indexes you need
Another possibility is to convert it to a normal array:
$arraybuff = implode("~~~",$my_arr);
$my_arr = explode("~~~",$arraybuff);
Where "~~~" is a delimiter that wont occur in your data.
Now you can access the array using numerical indexes equal to the offsets.
If you still need to retain your associative array, just assign it to a different variable.
