Your first link says that it took 35 minutes for a 1.6 GHz UltraSparc III to factor a 267-bit semiprime. A 267-bit number is less than 1081, so it is four orders of magnitude smaller than 1085. The 1.6 GHz UltraSparc is not a typical desktop machine, at least not where I live, but we can suppose that msieve running on a typical desktop machine will have similar performance. Unless you feel that you can reimplement msieve several thousand times as fast, it seems unlikely that you could factor a 85-digit number in less than 5 seconds.
For what it's worth, on my core-i5 laptop msieve took 124 seconds to factor the 76-digit semiprime 1031024382763741345720693024144503046286361588371249770826450615723688608887, which is the product of two 38-digit primes. In 5 seconds, it was able to do the 62-digit semiprime 7308332279578159953175572146691794473667384671982397578861693, which is the product of a 32-digit prime and a 30-digit prime. [Note 1]
Your second link -- "how to estimate the time" -- is meaningless. The time estimate is not measured in any particular units; it is simply an indication of growth rate. If an algorithm runs in Θ(f(n)) and you compute f(n) as 1000 (or 8.61036E20), you know essentially nothing: The algorithm could take 1000 nanoseconds or it could take 1000 years.
Notes
- I found those semiprimes by using msieve to factor 20 random 128-bit numbers, which gave me six primes with 30 or more decimal digits.