Running gcc
with -Wl,--verbose
prints things like
attempt to open /foo/gcc-6.3.0/lib64/../lib64/libm.so failed
attempt to open /foo/gcc-6.3.0/lib64/../lib64/libm.a failed
attempt to open /foo/gcc-6.3.0/lib/x86_64-redhat-linux/6.3.0/libm.so failed
attempt to open /foo/gcc-6.3.0/lib/x86_64-redhat-linux/6.3.0/libm.a failed
attempt to open /foo/gcc-6.3.0/lib/../lib64/libm.so failed
attempt to open /foo/gcc-6.3.0/lib/../lib64/libm.a failed
attempt to open /foo/gcc-6.3.0/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/6.3.0/libm.so failed
attempt to open /foo/gcc-6.3.0/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/6.3.0/libm.a failed
attempt to open /foo/gcc-6.3.0/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/6.3.0/../../../x86_64-redhat-linux/6.3.0/libm.so failed
attempt to open /foo/gcc-6.3.0/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/6.3.0/../../../x86_64-redhat-linux/6.3.0/libm.a failed
attempt to open /foo/gcc-6.3.0/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/6.3.0/../../../../lib64/libm.so failed
attempt to open /foo/gcc-6.3.0/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/6.3.0/../../../../lib64/libm.a failed
attempt to open /lib/../lib64/libm.so failed
attempt to open /lib/../lib64/libm.a failed
attempt to open /usr/lib/../lib64/libm.so succeeded
Is there a reason why these paths need to have a bunch of ../
in them? For example, why is /foo/gcc-6.3.0/lib64/../lib64/libm.so
not simply /foo/gcc-6.3.0/lib64/libm.so
? Also, some of the longer paths expand to the same thing, e.g. /foo/gcc-6.3.0/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/6.3.0/../../../../lib64/libm.so
and /foo/gcc-6.3.0/lib/../lib64/libm.so
.
Also, there's a marked lack of /foo/gcc-6.3.0/lib
, while most libraries are installed in lib
rather than lib64
.