While working on Antlr 3.5 grammar for Java parsing noticed that 'IDENTIFIER' rule consumes few Keywords in ANTLR Lexer grammar. The Lexer grammar is
lexer grammar JavaLexer;
options {
//k=8;
language=Java;
filter=true;
//backtrack=true;
}
@lexer::header {
package java;
}
@lexer::members {
public ArrayList<String> keywordsList = new ArrayList<String>();
}
V_DECLARATION
:
( ((MODIFIERS)=>tok1=MODIFIERS WS+)? tok2=TYPE WS+ var=V_DECLARATOR WS* )
{...};
fragment
V_DECLARATOR
:
(
tok=IDENTIFIER WS* ( ',' | ';' | ASSIGN WS* V_VALUE )
)
{...};
fragment
V_VALUE
: (IDENTIFIER (DOT WS* IDENTIFIER WS* '(' | ',' | ';'))
;
MODIFIERS
:
(PUBLIC | PRIVATE | FINAL)+
;
PRIVATE
: tok = 'private'
{ keywordsList.add($tok.getText()); }
;
PUBLIC
: tok = 'public'
{ keywordsList.add($tok.getText()); }
;
DOT
: '.'
{ keywordsList.add("."); }
;
THIS
: tok = 'this'
{ keywordsList.add($tok.getText()); }
;
ASSIGN
: '='
{ keywordsList.add("="); }
;
IDENTIFIER:
tok =Identifier
{
//System.out.println("Identifier: " + $tok.text);
}
;
fragment
Identifier
: (Letter (Letter|JavaIDDigit)*);
fragment
Letter
: '\u0024' |
'\u0041'..'\u005a' |
'\u005f' |
'\u0061'..'\u007a' |
'\u00c0'..'\u00d6' |
'\u00d8'..'\u00f6' |
'\u00f8'..'\u00ff' |
'\u0100'..'\u1fff' |
'\u3040'..'\u318f' |
'\u3300'..'\u337f' |
'\u3400'..'\u3d2d' |
'\u4e00'..'\u9fff' |
'\uf900'..'\ufaff'
;
fragment
JavaIDDigit
: '\u0030'..'\u0039' |
'\u0660'..'\u0669' |
'\u06f0'..'\u06f9' |
'\u0966'..'\u096f' |
'\u09e6'..'\u09ef' |
'\u0a66'..'\u0a6f' |
'\u0ae6'..'\u0aef' |
'\u0b66'..'\u0b6f' |
'\u0be7'..'\u0bef' |
'\u0c66'..'\u0c6f' |
'\u0ce6'..'\u0cef' |
'\u0d66'..'\u0d6f' |
'\u0e50'..'\u0e59' |
'\u0ed0'..'\u0ed9' |
'\u1040'..'\u1049'
;
WS : (' '|'\r'|'\t'|'\u000C'|'\n') {$channel=HIDDEN; skip();}
;
When I try to parse the line :
public final int inch = this.getValue();
Then the rule 'VAR_VALUE -> IDENTIFIER', also consumes the "this" keyword, which is undesirable, since keywords also be collected into a separate list.
Is there any trick/provision in Antlr grammar to match the keywords by itself rule without effecting the other functionality like "IDENTIFIER"?