Are there functions which would allow an OTP process to find the pid of its supervisor?
Asked
Active
Viewed 1,883 times
8
-
1No idea, but afaik you can get the linked processes and the supervisor is one of them. – ZeissS Nov 09 '10 at 09:52
2 Answers
14
The data is hidden in the process dictionary (of any process spawned with proc_lib
) under the entry '$ancestors'
:
1> proc_lib:spawn(fun() -> timer:sleep(infinity) end).
<0.33.0>
2> i(0,33,0).
[{current_function,{timer,sleep,1}},
{initial_call,{proc_lib,init_p,3}},
{status,waiting},
{message_queue_len,0},
{messages,[]},
{links,[]},
{dictionary,[{'$ancestors',[<0.31.0>]},
{'$initial_call',{erl_eval,'-expr/5-fun-1-',0}}]},
{trap_exit,false},
{error_handler,error_handler},
{priority,normal},
{group_leader,<0.24.0>},
{total_heap_size,233},
{heap_size,233},
{stack_size,6},
{reductions,62},
{garbage_collection,[{min_bin_vheap_size,46368},
{min_heap_size,233},
{fullsweep_after,65535},
{minor_gcs,0}]},
{suspending,[]}]
Here the line that interests us is {dictionary,[{'$ancestors',[<0.31.0>]},
.
Note that this is the kind of stuff you should rarely have any reason to use yourself. As far as I know, it's mostly used to handle clean termination in supervision trees rather than introspection for whatever code you have. Handle with care.
A cleaner way to do things without messing with OTP's sensible innards would be to have the supervisor pass its own pid as an argument to the process when starting it. This should be far less confusing for the people who'll read your code.

I GIVE TERRIBLE ADVICE
- 9,578
- 2
- 32
- 40
-
3I'd go with the pass of the supervisor pid as well. It is simpler to implement and maintain. – I GIVE CRAP ANSWERS Nov 10 '10 at 01:34
1
If you want to do it wrong, here's our solution:
%% @spec get_ancestors(proc()) -> [proc()]
%% @doc Find the supervisor for a process by introspection of proc_lib
%% $ancestors (WARNING: relies on an implementation detail of OTP).
get_ancestors(Pid) when is_pid(Pid) ->
case erlang:process_info(Pid, dictionary) of
{dictionary, D} ->
ancestors_from_dict(D);
_ ->
[]
end;
get_ancestors(undefined) ->
[];
get_ancestors(Name) when is_atom(Name) ->
get_ancestors(whereis(Name)).
ancestors_from_dict([]) ->
[];
ancestors_from_dict([{'$ancestors', Ancestors} | _Rest]) ->
Ancestors;
ancestors_from_dict([_Head | Rest]) ->
ancestors_from_dict(Rest).

YOUR ARGUMENT IS VALID
- 2,029
- 12
- 11