RocksDB: static library size that's built from source is really large

Question

When I build RocksDB using make static_lib that produces a 200MB+ librocksdb.a file, but when I install the same version through a package manager (compared to both Brew and apt), the .a file is only about 11MB. What am I missing?

Size of the library when building from source using make static_lib:

ubuntu@local:~/rocksdb-4.1$ du -sh librocksdb.a
238M    librocksdb.a

Size of the library installed using sudo apt-get install librocksdb-dev on Xenial:

ubuntu@local:~/rocksdb-4.1$ du -sh /usr/lib/librocksdb.a
11M /usr/lib/librocksdb.a

Why is there such a big difference?

Probably the smaller achive is stripped of debug information. — Cheers and hth. - Alf, Oct 22 '16 at 13:52
@Cheersandhth.-Alf - Indeed. I was not aware of strip. Just confirmed it, thanks - can you please add that as an answer? — jeffreyveon, Oct 22 '16 at 14:02

score 6 · Accepted Answer · answered Oct 22 '16 at 14:10

6

Probably the smaller achive is stripped of debug information.

You can use the strip command to remove symbols.

answered Oct 22 '16 at 14:10

Cheers and hth. - Alf

142,714
15
209
331

RocksDB: static library size that's built from source is really large

1 Answers1