Url fragment and Referer header

Question

Imagine you are on a page whose URL has a fragment (the part after the #), and click a link to go to another page. Most browsers will send the URL of the original page to the server in the Referer header. What I want to know is whether or not the URL fragment will be included in this or not.

I have seen various behaviors in the wild so this might be browser-specific. Does anyone know which browsers do what? And what does the HTTP spec say on this?

score 10 · Accepted Answer · answered Oct 14 '10 at 06:51

10

The spec says that Referer can't include a fragment identifier (per ABNF). See RFC 2616, Section 14.36.

answered Oct 14 '10 at 06:51

Julian Reschke

40,156
8
95
98

Does that bear out in practice though? I'm pretty sure I've seen at least some browsers include it. – levik Oct 14 '10 at 07:36
That would be interesting; if you can reproduce it please follow up on the IETF HTTPbis WG's mailing list. – Julian Reschke Oct 14 '10 at 11:05

score 2 · Answer 2 · answered Mar 08 '16 at 16:52

I saw the same behavior in IE today. I am using IE 11.0.9600.17801 and upon inspection i found out that the 'Referer' header contains this fragment identifier.

Referer: //abc:8080/myapp/ver/index.htm#search-basics

Although I am quite certain that I have seen this behavior on and off with the same browser.

score 0 · Answer 3 · answered Oct 14 '10 at 04:02

0

The spec says basicly that you can do whatever you want - it is an optional header, i just tested webkit ignores the fragment, as do firefox and IE.

answered Oct 14 '10 at 04:02

tobyodavies

27,347
5
42
57

Url fragment and Referer header

3 Answers3

Linked