I have a dataframe in Python. Can I write this data to Redshift as a new table? I have successfully created a db connection to Redshift and am able to execute simple sql queries. Now I need to write a dataframe to it.
7 Answers
You can use to_sql
to push data to a Redshift database. I've been able to do this using a connection to my database through a SQLAlchemy engine. Just be sure to set index = False
in your to_sql
call. The table will be created if it doesn't exist, and you can specify if you want you call to replace the table, append to the table, or fail if the table already exists.
from sqlalchemy import create_engine
import pandas as pd
conn = create_engine('postgresql://username:password@yoururl.com:5439/yourdatabase')
df = pd.DataFrame([{'A': 'foo', 'B': 'green', 'C': 11},{'A':'bar', 'B':'blue', 'C': 20}])
df.to_sql('your_table', conn, index=False, if_exists='replace')
Note that you may need to pip install psycopg2
in order to connect to Redshift through SQLAlchemy.

- 1,698
- 14
- 15
-
2does `if_exists='replace'` work for you? it doesn't do anything for me – maxymoo Nov 10 '16 at 05:08
-
Yes, if the table already exists then the contents of the table are replaced with the contents of the dataframe. – Andrew Nov 10 '16 at 14:00
-
2@Andrew, does the `to_sql` method in pandas take advantage of Redshift's MPP architecture? I noticed that it takes a bit of time to copy a DF with 22K rows – lollerskates Jan 11 '17 at 22:46
-
1@lollerskates, no, it doesn't, as far as I know. Pandas doesn't even know it's communicating with Redshift specifically since you pass the connection/engine object into the method. One possible reason that the insert is slow is because when pandas submits the SQL command, it's not doing one insert with 22K records; it's inserting each record individually. I've been able to speed things up by monkey patching pandas so that it will do a bulk insert, as explained here: https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/8953 – Andrew Jan 12 '17 at 21:25
-
2@Andrew I have trouble configure your link "postgresql://username:password@yoururl.com:5439/yourdatabase" Can you please provide more detail how to replace each element using my credentials? – Learn Nov 28 '18 at 22:11
-
how to add data types while using to_sql. Like json data for redshift SUPER type? – raaj Aug 30 '21 at 03:59
-
If you need to add the dataframe to an existing table you can use if_exists ='append' – Minesh Barot Sep 23 '21 at 15:41
import pandas_redshift as pr
pr.connect_to_redshift(dbname = <dbname>,
host = <host>,
port = <port>,
user = <user>,
password = <password>)
pr.connect_to_s3(aws_access_key_id = <aws_access_key_id>,
aws_secret_access_key = <aws_secret_access_key>,
bucket = <bucket>,
subdirectory = <subdirectory>)
# Write the DataFrame to S3 and then to redshift
pr.pandas_to_redshift(data_frame = data_frame,
redshift_table_name = 'gawronski.nba_shots_log')

- 2,055
- 1
- 14
- 24
-
I am getting this error "current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of transaction block". Any idea about this? – rahul rachh Nov 30 '21 at 03:10
-
I used Red Panda package and installed it using the command: "pip install red-panda". It was better suited for me to complete the task in 2 mins. – rahul rachh Nov 30 '21 at 04:50
-
Isn't there any other way to connect to S3? boto3 connects s3 bucket itself in aws lambda – Vishvas Chauhan Feb 10 '22 at 22:19
-
I tried using pandas df.to_sql()
but it was tremendously slow. It was taking me well over 10 minutes to insert 50 rows. See this open issue (as of writing)
I tried using odo
from the blaze ecosystem (as per the recommendations in the issue discussion), but faced a ProgrammingError
which I didn't bother to investigate into.
Finally what worked:
import psycopg2
# Fill in the blanks for the conn object
conn = psycopg2.connect(user = 'user',
password = 'password',
host = 'host',
dbname = 'db',
port = 666)
cursor = conn.cursor()
# Adjust ... according to number of columns
args_str = b','.join(cursor.mogrify("(%s,%s,...)", x) for x in tuple(map(tuple,np_data)))
cursor.execute("insert into table (a,b,...) VALUES "+args_str.decode("utf-8"))
cursor.close()
conn.commit()
conn.close()
Yep, plain old psycopg2
. This is for a numpy array but converting from a df
to a ndarray
shouldn't be too difficult. This gave me around 3k rows/minute.
However, the fastest solution as per recommendations from other team mates is to use the COPY command after dumping the dataframe as a TSV/CSV into a S3 cluster and then copying over. You should investigate into this if you're copying really huge datasets. (I will update here if and when I try it out)

- 1,095
- 10
- 19
-
-
Could you explain what needs to be placed in the `...` places in your two lines `args_str` and `cursor.execute`? – Jonas Palačionis Apr 16 '20 at 14:44
-
1Hi @JonasPalačionis, that is a placeholder for the number of columns you have in your data. For 2 columns, it would be `(%s,%s)` and the `cursor.execute` would be `(a,b)` assuming your columns are named `a` and `b`. – Gaurav Apr 16 '20 at 20:23
-
I get this error while trying this sol: SyntaxError: syntax error at or near "table" LINE 1: insert into table (id,type,customer,customer_id,generation_d... ^ – Devarshi Goswami Mar 22 '21 at 09:21
-
np_data = df. to_numpy() but your cur. execute () showing syntec error. please fix. – Vishvas Chauhan Feb 10 '22 at 20:53
Assuming you have access to S3, this approach should work:
Step 1: Write the DataFrame as a csv to S3 (I use AWS SDK boto3 for this)
Step 2: You know the columns, datatypes, and key/index for your Redshift table from your DataFrame, so you should be able to generate a create table
script and push it to Redshift to create an empty table
Step 3: Send a copy
command from your Python environment to Redshift to copy data from S3 into the empty table created in step 2
Works like a charm everytime.
Step 4: Before your cloud storage folks start yelling at you delete the csv from S3
If you see yourself doing this several times, wrapping all four steps in a function keeps it tidy.

- 307
- 3
- 3
-
I use the same solution to dump over a million rows. I chunk them into 100k rows at a time into a csv file, then use manifest to import at a go. The only problem is that I was not able to gzip the files to speed up COPY. – Mar 08 '18 at 12:44
I used to rely on pandas to_sql()
function, but it is just too slow. I have recently switched to doing the following:
import pandas as pd
import s3fs # great module which allows you to read/write to s3 easily
import sqlalchemy
df = pd.DataFrame([{'A': 'foo', 'B': 'green', 'C': 11},{'A':'bar', 'B':'blue', 'C': 20}])
s3 = s3fs.S3FileSystem(anon=False)
filename = 'my_s3_bucket_name/file.csv'
with s3.open(filename, 'w') as f:
df.to_csv(f, index=False, header=False)
con = sqlalchemy.create_engine('postgresql://username:password@yoururl.com:5439/yourdatabase')
# make sure the schema for mytable exists
# if you need to delete the table but not the schema leave DELETE mytable
# if you want to only append, I think just removing the DELETE mytable would work
con.execute("""
DELETE mytable;
COPY mytable
from 's3://%s'
iam_role 'arn:aws:iam::xxxx:role/role_name'
csv;""" % filename)
the role has to allow redshift access to S3 see here for more details
I found that for a 300KB file (12000x2 dataframe) this takes 4 seconds compared to the 8 minutes I was getting with pandas to_sql()
function

- 1,649
- 21
- 23
For the purpose of this conversation Postgres = RedShift You have two options:
Option 1:
From Pandas: http://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/io.html#io-sql
The pandas.io.sql module provides a collection of query wrappers to both facilitate data retrieval and to reduce dependency on DB-specific API. Database abstraction is provided by SQLAlchemy if installed. In addition you will need a driver library for your database. Examples of such drivers are psycopg2 for PostgreSQL or pymysql for MySQL.
Writing DataFrames
Assuming the following data is in a DataFrame data, we can insert it into the database using to_sql().
id Date Col_1 Col_2 Col_3
26 2012-10-18 X 25.7 True
42 2012-10-19 Y -12.4 False
63 2012-10-20 Z 5.73 True
In [437]: data.to_sql('data', engine)
With some databases, writing large DataFrames can result in errors due to packet size limitations being exceeded. This can be avoided by setting the chunksize parameter when calling to_sql. For example, the following writes data to the database in batches of 1000 rows at a time:
In [438]: data.to_sql('data_chunked', engine, chunksize=1000)
Option 2
Or you can simply do your own If you have a dataframe called data simply loop over it using iterrows:
for row in data.iterrows():
then add each row to your database. I would use copy instead of insert for each row, as it will be much faster.
http://initd.org/psycopg/docs/usage.html#using-copy-to-and-copy-from

- 2,268
- 15
- 25
-
Thanks for your answer, but dataframes create indexes. Redshift doesn't support indexes so not sure if we can write data to Redshift as a dataframe . – Sahil Jul 18 '16 at 18:56
Given all the answers were not able to solve my query so I googled and got the following snippet which completed the work in 2 mins. I am using Python 3.8.5 on windows.
from red_panda import RedPanda
import pandas as pd
df = pd.read_csv('path_to_read_csv_file')
redshift_conf = {
"user": "username",
"password": "password",
"host": "hostname",
"port": port number in integer,
"dbname": "dbname",
}
aws_conf = {
"aws_access_key_id": "<access_key>",
"aws_secret_access_key": "<secret_key>",
# "aws_session_token": "temporary-token-if-you-have-one",
}
rp = RedPanda(redshift_conf, aws_conf)
s3_bucket = "bucketname"
s3_path = "subfolder if any" # optional, if you don't have any sub folders
s3_file_name = "filename" # optional, randomly generated if not provided
rp.df_to_redshift(df, "table_name", bucket=s3_bucket, path=s3_path, append=False)
for more info check out the package on github here

- 99
- 1
- 12