4

I've tried:

hgroup [label "Note"    64 AFV_Note:    area 100x50]

That produces the correct width but the height is still too tall.

I also tried:

hgroup [label "Note"    64 AFV_Note:    area options [init-size: 100x50]]

That results in an error; probably not an option for 'area'.

GordR
  • 91
  • 8
  • RE: [*"If you thought the documentation for the Visual Interface Dialect was bad, you should try the Draw Dialect."*](http://rebolforum.com/index.cgi?f=printtopic&permalink=Steven%20White20-May-2016/15:15:21-7:00&archiveflag=new) => It might be fair warning to know that r3-gui is not evolving much, and that the most likely GUI future in Redbol will be an based on [Red's GUI system](http://www.red-lang.org/2016/03/060-red-gui-system.html), which has attention being put on it by multiple people. – HostileFork says dont trust SE May 28 '16 at 06:47
  • Yes, I too was waiting for RED. But when 6.0 came out with no Android nor mySQL, I thought I would continue to work with R3 and port my code when RED is there. – GordR May 29 '16 at 01:35

1 Answers1

1

Does this help at all?

https://github.com/gchiu/RSOChat/blob/master/rsochat.r3#L811

chat-area: area "" 600x90 options [min-hint: 750x50 detab: true]
Graham Chiu
  • 4,856
  • 1
  • 23
  • 41
  • Thanks for the link, it got me trying a bunch of different combos but nothing I've tried makes the height less. With the 'options' it seems to ignore the first pair of numbers. I also used init-size of 200x50 and it made the area a bit wider but no less tall. It seems there is hard coded a limit for the height. I'll have a look to see if I can figure out why. – GordR May 29 '16 at 01:54