Under what circumstances does a looping construct require evaluation by the interpreter in Red? Which looping constructs do not?
Update (4/20/2015):
Below is an small program I wrote to demo the language to some students. Two of the functions 'list and 'find have foreach loops in them. But the foreach loops will not run unless they are wrapped in a do block. This scenario in particular is what prompted the original question, since the body of the foreach loops are not indirectly specified.
Model.red
Red [
Title: "Model"
Author: "Thomas Royko"
Version: 0.0.1
]
entry!: make object! [
name: ""
quantity: 0
notes: ""
display: does [
print ["-- " name]
print ["-- " quantity]
print ["-- " notes newline]
]
]
enter: func [
entries value
/local quantity notes
] [
qt: load ask "Enter quantity: "
nt: ask "Enter notes: "
append entries make entry! copy [
name: value
quantity: qt
notes: nt
]
print ""
]
find: func [
entries value
/local found entry
] [
found: false
do [
foreach entry entries [
if entry/name = value [
entry/display
found: true
break
]
]
]
if not found [
print ["** No entry with code" value newline]
]
]
list: func [
entries
] [
do [
foreach entry entries [
entry/display
]
]
]
finish: func [
entries
] [
save %inventory.db entries
quit
]
Console.red
Red [
Title: "Console"
Author: "Thomas Royko"
Version: 0.0.1
]
#include %Bindings.red
#include %Model.red
entries: either exists? %inventory.db [
reduce load %inventory.db
] [
copy []
]
rule: [
(value: "")
1 [
["e" space copy value to end (enter entries value)] |
["f" space copy value to end (find entries value)] |
["l" to end (list entries)] |
["q" to end (finish entries)] |
[(print ["** Code not recognized" newline])]
]
]
forever [
parse ask "Command: " rule
]