We're seeing a strange situation on our iOS app that is impacting our user experience.
When a user background's the app (by pressing the Home button), we can clearly see the app entering the background. When the user then force-closes the app (by double-tappinging the Home button and sliding-up on the app), the app terminates normally. When the app is then re-opened, it follows the normal iOS start-up sequencing.
However, if the user double-taps the Home button while the app is running (resigning the app from active, but not sending it to background) and then force-closes the app (by sliding-up on the app), we're seeing the app terminate (the process gets killed), but then the app immediately re-starts in the background (with a new pid). The app is not designed to start-up or run in the background, and this is causing UX issues.
The app has no entitlements to run in the background, although we do have a couple of third-party libraries that have tasks that wind-down when the app enters the background.
I suspect the issue is a result of the app being force-closed from a non-active state rather than a background-state. If the app enters the background first, the third-party tasks are getting a chance to complete. If the app is force-closed from the non-active state, the tasks never get a change to complete in the background, so iOS is restarting the app in background to give those tasks a change to finish. It's unclear, however, if this is correct behavior.
-Stix