0

given an image composed of a plain black field with a single white rectangle inside it somewhere, how can i extract the coordinates of the rectangle ? i've googled and googled and found numerous articles on edge detection using hough lines, convolution, morphology, etc., but all of these actually edge the image or convert it in some way. i don't want to change the image, all i want to do is find where the edges are.

obviously, i could simply iterate over the entire width+height of the image and look at the pixel colours (as some posts suggest), but that seems horribly inefficient. is there no built-in algorithm ? it seems like this must be part of imagick somewhere, otherwise how could it actually find and draw the edges of internal images ? but i'm having trouble finding out how to get at it.

david furst
  • 329
  • 4
  • 17

2 Answers2

1
$base = new Imagick(realpath('./trim.png'));
$base->trimImage(0);
// get the new image size
$geometry = $base->getImageGeometry();
// Retrieve the trim info
$pageInfo = $base->getImagePage();

A similar example is on the manual page: http://php.net/manual/en/imagick.trimimage.php#111332

Danack
  • 24,939
  • 16
  • 90
  • 122
  • Hm - 12.9k reputation and a code-only answer? Mhhh, would be nice if you could add some words. ([From Review](http://stackoverflow.com/review/low-quality-posts/10996110)) – Charlotte Dunois Jan 22 '16 at 22:43
  • 1
    @CharlotteDunois I have answered 109 questions tagged 'Imagick' for a total upvote count of ...84. Some of those answers took multiple hours to write. It should not be too surprising that my answers may be brief. – Danack Jan 22 '16 at 23:19
  • thanks, danack, your solution set me on the right track. in fact, there was one more step needed to make it work -- the setImagePage() mentioned in the manual page note. so the complete solution is below (can't post it here because of the 'mini-markdown' formatting). – david furst Jan 25 '16 at 18:52
0

it appears the complete solution to the problem as posted is as follows :

$im->trimImage(0);
$pagedata = $im->getImagePage();
$x = $pagedata['x'];
$y = $pagedata['y'];
$im->setImagePage(0, 0, 0, 0);
$w = $im->width;
$h = $im->height;

not setting the image page before getting the height and width return the height and width of the entire original image, as the note on your referenced page suggests.

it turns out the solution is even easier if you're working with an image that uses transparency ; it's just the getImagePage() function alone :

$im = new Imagick(realpath('./image.png'));
$pagedata = $im->getImagePage();
$x = $pagedata['x'];
$y = $pagedata['y'];
$w = $pagedata['width'];
$h = $pagedata['height'];
print("x,y: $x, $y<br>\n");
print("w,h: $w, $h<br>\n");

for some reason, if trimImage(0) is used with this transparent image, the (x,y) coordinates are set to (-1,-1). unfortunately i don't know enough about imagick to say why this happens. maybe you could answer this, @danack ?

david furst
  • 329
  • 4
  • 17