I have to count all '=' between two pattern i.e '{' and '}' Sample:
{
100="1";
101="2";
102="3";
};
{
104="1,2,3";
};
{
105="1,2,3";
};
Expected Output:
3
1
1
I have to count all '=' between two pattern i.e '{' and '}' Sample:
{
100="1";
101="2";
102="3";
};
{
104="1,2,3";
};
{
105="1,2,3";
};
Expected Output:
3
1
1
A very cryptic perl answer:
perl -nE 's/\{(.*?)\}/ say ($1 =~ tr{=}{=}) /ge'
The tr
function returns the number of characters transliterated.
With the new requirements, we can make a couple of small changes:
perl -0777 -nE 's/\{(.*?)\}/ say ($1 =~ tr{=}{=}) /ges'
-0777
reads the entire file/stream into a single strings
flag to the s///
function allows .
to handle newlines like a plain character.Perl to the rescue:
perl -lne '$c = 0; $c += ("$1" =~ tr/=//) while /\{(.*?)\}/g; print $c' < input
-n
reads the input line by line-l
adds a newline to each print
/\{(.*?)\}/g
is a regular expression. The ?
makes the asterisk frugal, i.e. matching the shortest possible string.(...)
parentheses create a capture group, refered to as $1
.tr
is normally used to transliterate (i.e. replace one character by another), but here it just counts the number of equal signs.+=
adds the number to $c
.Awk is here too
grep -o '{[^}]\+}'|awk -v FS='=' '{print NF-1}'
example
echo '{100="1";101="2";102="3";};
{104="1,2,3";};
{105="1,2,3";};'|grep -o '{[^}]\+}'|awk -v FS='=' '{print NF-1}'
output
3
1
1
First some test input (a line with a = outside the curly brackets and inside the content, one without brackets and one with only 2 brackets)
echo '== {100="1";101="2";102="3=3=3=3";} =;
a=b
{c=d}
{}'
Handle line without brackets (put a dummy char so you will not end up with an empty string)
sed -e 's/^[^{]*$/x/'
Handle line without equal sign (put a dummy char so you will not end up with an empty string)
sed -e 's/{[^=]*}/x/'
Remove stuff outside the brackets
sed -e 's/.*{\(.*\)}/\1/'
Remove stuff inside the double quotes (do not count fields there)
sed -e 's/"[^"]*"//g'
Use @repzero method to count equal signs
awk -F "=" '{print NF-1}'
Combine stuff
echo -e '{100="1";101="2";102="3";};\na=b\n{c=d}\n{}' |
sed -e 's/^[^{]*$/x/' -e 's/{[^=]*}/x/' -e 's/.*{\(.*\)}/\1/' -e 's/"[^"]*"//g' |
awk -F "=" '{print NF-1}'
The ugly temp fields x and replacing {}
can be solved inside awk:
echo -e '= {100="1";101="2=2=2=2";102="3";};\na=b\n{c=d}\n{}' |
sed -e 's/^[^{]*$//' -e 's/.*{\(.*\)}/\1/' -e 's/"[^"]*"//g' |
awk -F "=" '{if (NF>0) c=NF-1; else c=0; print c}'
or shorter
echo -e '= {100="1";101="2=2=2=2";102="3";};\na=b\n{c=d}\n{}' |
sed -e 's/^[^{]*$//' -e 's/.*{\(.*\)}/\1/' -e 's/"[^"]*"//g' |
awk -F "=" '{print (NF>0) ? NF-1 : 0; }'
No harder sed
than done ... in.
Restricting this answer to the environment as tagged, namely:
linux shell unix sed wc
will actually not require the use of wc (or awk
, perl
, or any other app.).
Though echo
is used, a file source can easily exclude its use.
As for bash
, it is the shell.
The actual environment used is documented at the end.
NB. Exploitation of GNU specific extensions has been used for brevity but appropriately annotated to make a more generic implementation. Also brace bracketed { text } will not include braces in the text. It is implicit that such braces should be present as {} pairs but the text src. dangling brace does not directly violate this tenet.This is a foray into the world of `sed`'ng to gain some fluency in it's use for other purposes. The ideas expounded upon here are used to cross pollinate another SO problem solution in order to aquire more familiarity with vetting vagaries of vernacular version variances. Consequently this pedantic exercice hopefully helps with the pedagogy of others beyond personal edification. To test easily, at least in the environment noted below, judiciously highlight the appropriate code section, carefully excluding a dangling pipe |, and then, to a CLI command line interface drag & drop, copy & paste or use middle click to enter the code.
The other SO problem. linux - Is it possible to do simple arithmetic in sed addresses?
# _______________________________ always needed ________________________________
echo -e '\n
\n = = = {\n } = = = each = is outside the braces
\na\nb\n { } so therefore are not counted
\nc\n { = = = = = = = } while the ones here do count
{\n100="1";\n101="2";\n102="3";\n};
\n {\n104="1,2,3";\n};
a\nb\nc\n {\n105="1,2,3";\n};
{ dangling brace ignored junk = = = \n' |
# _____________ prepatory conditioning needed for final solutions _____________
sed ' s/{/\n{\n/g;
s/}/\n}\n/g; ' | # guarantee but one brace to a line
sed -n '/{/ h; # so sed addressing can "work" here
/{/,/}/ H; # use hHold buffer for only { ... }
/}/ { x; s/[^=]*//g; p } ' | # then make each {} set a line of =
# ____ stop code hi-lite selection in ^--^ here include quote not pipe ____
# ____ outputs the following exclusive of the shell " # " comment quotes _____
#
#
# =======
# ===
# =
# =
# _________________________________________________________________________
# ____________________________ "simple" GNU solution ____________________________
sed -e '/^$/ { s//0/;b }; # handle null data as 0 case: next!
s/=/\n/g; # to easily count an = make it a nl
s/\n$//g; # echo adds an extra nl - delete it
s/.*/echo "&" | sed -n $=/; # sed = command w/ $ counts last nl
e ' # who knew only GNU say you ah phoo
# 0
# 0
# 7
# 3
# 1
# 1
# _________________________________________________________________________
# ________________________ generic incomplete "solution" ________________________
sed -e '/^$/ { s//echo 0/;b }; # handle null data as 0 case: next!
s/=$//g; # echo adds an extra nl - delete it
s/=/\\\\n/g; # to easily count an = make it a nl
s/.*/echo -e & | sed -n $=/; '
# _______________________________________________________________________________
The paradigm used for the algorithm is instigated by the prolegomena study below.
The idea is to isolate groups of =
signs between { }
braces for counting.
These are found and each group is put on a separate line with ALL other adorning characters removed.
It is noted that sed
can easily "count", actually enumerate, nl or \n line ends via =
.
The first "solution" uses these sed
commands:
p
rintb
ranch w/o label starts a new cycleh
/H
old for filling this sed
bufferx
chanage to swap the hold and pattern buffers=
to enumerate the current sed
input lines
ubstitute s/.../.../;
with g
lobal flag s/.../.../g;
and most particularly the GNU specific
e
valuate (e
xecute can not remember the actual mnemonic but irrelevantly synonymous)The GNU specific e
xecute command is avoided in the generic code. It does not print the answer but
instead produces code that will print the answer. Run it to observe. To fully automate this, many
mechanisms can be used not the least of which is the sed
w
rite command to put these lines in a
shell file to be excuted or even embed the output in bash
evaluation parentheses $( )
etc.
Note also that various sed
example scripts can "count" and these too can be used efficaciously.
The interested reader can entertain these other pursuits.
prolegomena: concept from counting # of lines between braces
sed -n '/{/=;/}/=;'
to
sed -n '/}/=;/{/=;' |
sed -n 'h;n;G;s/\n/ - /;
2s/^/ Between sets of {} \n the nl # count is\n /;
2!s/^/ /;
p'
testing "done in":
linuxuser@ubuntu:~$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS
Release: 18.04
Codename: bionic
linuxuser@ubuntu:~$ sed --version -----> sed (GNU sed) 4.4
And for giggles an awk
-only alternative:
echo '{
> 100="1";
> 101="2";
> 102="3";
> };
> {
> 104="1,2,3";
> };
> {
> 105="1,2,3";
> };' | awk 'BEGIN{RS="\n};";FS="\n"}{c=gsub(/=/,""); if(NF>2){print c}}'
3
1
1