0

In a single session I'd like to have two different routines that each creates their own temp tables (and insert values into them) inside of their own transactions. The db's tx_isolation is REPEATABLE-READ. Under what circumstances would the routines be able to make progress concurrently - if the tables had the same name would they be forced into serial order? If the temp table names are different would they not need transactions in the first place.

lf215
  • 1,185
  • 7
  • 41
  • 83

0 Answers0