I'm trying to develop a GDB python extension that defines a command that launches a new thread, in which the user can inspect an arbitrary type of variables. The skeleton of my python extension is this:
import gdb
import threading
def plot_thread():
import time
while True:
print('Placeholder for a window event loop.')
time.sleep(1)
pass
pass
class PlotterCommand(gdb.Command):
def __init__(self):
super(PlotterCommand, self).__init__("plot",
gdb.COMMAND_DATA,
gdb.COMPLETE_SYMBOL)
self.dont_repeat()
pass
def invoke(self, arg, from_tty):
plot_thread_instance=threading.Thread(target=plot_thread)
plot_thread_instance.daemon=True
plot_thread_instance.start()
pass
pass
PlotterCommand()
As can be seen, I define a plot command here. When I try to debug the following program, GDB will hang if I:
- Put a breakpoint anywhere inside the procedure() thread (say, line 9, inside the while loop).
- Run the command plot after gdb hits the breakpoint.
- Run continue after that.
#include <iostream>
#include <thread>
using namespace std;
void procedure() {
cout << "before loop"<<endl;
while(1) {
cout << "loop iteration"<<endl;
}
}
int main() {
thread t(procedure);
t.join();
return 0;
}
The strangest thing is that, if I change this code to call procedure() without launching a thread, GDB never hangs (and the placeholder messages are still printed as I expect).
So far, I've tried to run this procedure with GDB versions 7.5.1 and 7.10, but I always experience the same behavior.
What am I doing wrong? Aren't daemon threads not supported by GDB? That doesn't seem to be in accordance with what the section 23.2.2.1 of the documentation is suggesting: GDB may not be thread safe, but I don't think it should hang after launching such a silly daemon thread.