How to run a gulp task from another task?

Question

I am aware of the ability to declare dependencies that will run before the task, e.g.

gulp.task('a', () => {});
gulp.task('b', () => {});
gulp.task('c', ['a', 'c'], () => {});

Tasks 'a' and 'b' will be run every time after task 'c' is called and before task 'c' is executed.

However, how do I programmatically call an arbitrary task from within a gulp.task?

Answer 1

I did it using gulp.start(); like this:

gulp.task('test1', function(){
  gulp.start('test2');
})

gulp.task('test2', function(){
  // do something
})

I was using gulp 3.9.1 if it matters. Looks like gulp.start() may be removed or deprecated; but it hasn't happened yet.

---

Update If I were to break things out into separate functions, as Novellizator suggested, it would be something like this:

function doSomething(){
  // do something
}

gulp.task('test1', function(){
  doSomething();
})

gulp.task('test2', function(){
  doSomething();
})

It is simple and avoids the use of gulp.start().

Answer 2

From Gulp 4+ I found this to work well as a replacement for gulp.start:

const task1 = () => { /*do stuff*/ };
const task2 = () => { /*do stuff*/ };

// Register the tasks with gulp. They will be named the same as their function
gulp.task(task1);
gulp.task(task2);

...

// Elsewhere in your gulfile you can run these tasks immediately by calling them like this
(gulp.series("task1", "task2")());
// OR
(gulp.parallel("task1", "task2")());

Answer 3

On the general theme of "don't" from the other answers, it depends what you're doing.

If you're thinking:

gulp.task("a", () => {
    doSomethingInstant()
    return doTaskB()
})

You want:

gulp.task("meta-a", () => {
    doSomethingInstant()
})
gulp.task("a", ["meta-a", "b"])

This works because all the tasks are started in order, so if you're not doing anything async in "meta-a", it will finish before "b" starts. If it's async then you need to be much more explicit:

gulp.task("meta-a", () => {
    return doSomethingAsync()
})
function taskB() {
    // Original task B code...
}
gulp.task("b", taskB)
gulp.task("a", ["meta-a"], taskB)

Answer 4

On a related note, you can initiate the tasks using either gulp.series or gulp.parallel in gulp v4. Although it's not a direct replacement for gulp.start, it achieves the same objective.

Example:

Before v4

gulp.task('protractor', ['protractor:src']);

After v4

gulp.task('protractor', gulp.series('protractor:src'));

Answer 5

As JeffryHouser stated above using the following method works but is deprecated and will be removed in future versions. I just attempted the following on 3.9.1 and it works fine.

Code:

// Variables
var gulp = require('gulp');
var less = require('gulp-less');
var watch = require('gulp-watch');


// Task to compile less -> css: Method 1- The bad way
gulp.task('default', function(){
    gulp.src('src/*.less')
    gulp.start('lessToCss');
});

gulp.task('lessToCss', function() {
    gulp.src('src/*.less')
    .pipe(less())
    .pipe(gulp.dest('src/main.css'));
});

The second way mentioned in the comment by Novellizator is:

"Break tasks out into functions, then reuse them in other tasks if you need to" piece of advice from the aforementioned issue

I do this by use of lazypipe() https://www.npmjs.com/package/lazypipe

Code:

// Variables
var gulp = require('gulp');
var less = require('gulp-less');
var watch = require('gulp-watch');

var lazypipe = require('lazypipe');
var fixMyCSS = lazypipe()
     .pipe(less); // Be CAREFUL here do not use less() it will give you an errror



// Task to compile less -> css: Method 2 - The nice way
gulp.task('default', function(){
    //gulp.start('lessToCss');
    gulp.src('src/*.less')
    .pipe(fixMyCSS())
    .pipe(gulp.dest('src/main.css'));
});

A brief comparison

Method 1 yielding the following:

• Starting 'default'...
• [22:59:12] Starting 'lessToCss'...
• [22:59:12] Finished 'lessToCss' after 13 ms
• [22:59:12] Finished 'default' after 48 ms

For a total of 61 ms to complete

Method 2? - [23:03:24] Starting 'default'... - [23:03:24] Finished 'default' after 38 ms

Practically half that at 38 ms

For a total difference of 23 ms

Now why this is the case? I honestly don't know enough about gulp to say, but let's say method 2 is clearly the more readable,maintainable and even the faster choice.

They are both easy to write so long as you understand not to call a stream directly within the lazypipe().

Answer 6

The best way form me is:

task('task1', () => {
  // Buy potatoes
});

task('task2', ['task1'], () => {
  // Cut potatoes
});

The result of the task2 it will be: Buy potatoes and Cut potatoes

Answer 7

There are a couple of ways to do this: The first one: just invoke a new task call for the other:

gulp.task('foo', function() {
  gulp.task('caller', ['bar']); // <- this calls the other existing task!
}
gulp.task('bar', function() {
  //do something
}

The second, less cleaner one: Gulp is Javascript, so you just set a couple of instructions as a random function and call it!

gulp.task('task', function() {
  recurrent_task();
}
gulp.task('task2', function() {
  recurrent_task();
}
function recurrent_task() {
  //do something
}