Objective-C ARC - does a method retain 'self'?

Question

Is this a safe thing to do?

__weak typeof (self) welf = self;
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
    [welf doStuff];
})

....

-(void)doStuff {
    [_member1 someMethod];
    ....
    [_member2 someMethodWithParam:_someCArray[1];];
}

As far as I understand ARC, the actual call to [welf doStuff] should be fine, as welf will either be valid (and the method call will proceed), or it will be nil - calling any method on nil is defined safe behaviour in Objective-C so that seems ok.

Once we get into doStuff however, does ARC cause self to be retained for the duration of the method call? If it does, I think we should be ok... If not, then self could get dealloc'ed halfway through the method call and then we'd be in a bad spot.

Note: I googled for this but couldn't find anything obvious. Perhaps it's just hard to search for?

Thanks!

@YuriiKolesnykov I don't see how that questions answers this one. — Rupert, Sep 09 '15 at 00:12
This is not a duplicate of the other question. The other question focuses on retain cycles. — John K, Feb 21 '17 at 18:31

score 2 · Answer 1 · edited May 23 '17 at 12:16

2

As it turns out I found the answer eventually, both here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/18011581/234 and here: http://clang.llvm.org/docs/AutomaticReferenceCounting.html#self

self is always unsafe unretained under ARC, so in my example, it would NOT be safe, and there would be nothing to stop it getting deallocated partway through my doStuff method. Ouch

edited May 23 '17 at 12:16

Community

1
1

answered Sep 09 '15 at 00:29

Orion Edwards

121,657
64
239
328

Your example is ok because welf is essentially retained once doStuff is called until doStuff returns. – John K Feb 21 '17 at 18:24

Objective-C ARC - does a method retain 'self'?

1 Answers1

Linked