1

i have already included jquery.js and jquery.1.3.2.js on my page for other functionality.I think it is getting conflicted with other.plz reply

Gordon
  • 312,688
  • 75
  • 539
  • 559
  • 3
    This is a poor question, please include some code samples and what other frameworks you're using (if any). Also either animate HTML or BODY, why would you want both? – Marko Jul 03 '10 at 12:43
  • Parimal Naik - Welcome to stackoverflow. Please take a moment to read the http://stackoverflow.com/faq as it gives helpful information on posting questions. :o) You can edit your question or use these comments to provide more information. Then when someone has given a suitable answer, click the checkmark next to that answer. Thanks. :o) – user113716 Jul 03 '10 at 13:59
  • @Marko - Please try to be more patient with new users. ;o) – user113716 Jul 03 '10 at 14:04

2 Answers2

2

Why would you include 2 different versions of jQuery on the same page? jQuery is pretty good with backwards compatibility, so try using ONLY the latest.

Luca Matteis
  • 29,161
  • 19
  • 114
  • 169
0

If jquery.js is in fact jquery 1.4.2, then you must read this for example:

Two jQuery versions on the same page

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Gavrisimo
  • 1,827
  • 5
  • 25
  • 33